[nfsv4] Future documents related to rfc5661bis effort

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Fri, 26 November 2021 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA2F3A09D5; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:30:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EHsJFAxyyuLS; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FAAA3A09D4; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id y13so42152393edd.13; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:30:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Zsj5j+F8gHLgR6bwnp6wVHSX9q9NTHxX1PNL+8am0HY=; b=OtD0anCVmgTrf8zv0IzNpeRwU0tBAWzms0J0LnEYR6M9OILc2i+qz3b9Z6jueZEumb ZRnQEq24wv0Ba9Rg3wldcnwwL0X5YOXYAo9VzLyiab5Fe4z4x7Sb7mXyWYQbCvt8FJnW WlqrWuEvbpHAnXDg9IIM+pLYcIr/2TAp3jc0U8xRK2FU4FY5wws6p916eOKWKzbP8W66 iK96qgb0K1lyvXi53JjrGWAqbOwNq4JJQK4wWVUZVK02ebrSTPPysFP+LMvKTsycBQ1j c0jbvAy3YW0VZ98Z4FxmNVD8eYIm1bbcSt08/ecVsXE6N4Dtf+Mrr24FfmgjRfthK/8a 7uiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Zsj5j+F8gHLgR6bwnp6wVHSX9q9NTHxX1PNL+8am0HY=; b=nojMStzCj7M/jf612jnilLqL2COhM6Jm+zBegxUQ+ePr6eSk4QbVOomvgnlso8Oda4 RCIs6kwaV3xZloZPFlyzr/8E74JSJVOQINPRoDSvK0egBazmRtvzYCACS9QAApcJE1cz bQXjvcKOg73np1+Hqu0QtTMJ7hEtPKpvIoPCriXv0dlb6evJjcilCkAQqPDVTfE9J5kl R3oNvGT2fS94J1PJ8prB5gF346oDb0tsWGw/gr87tHygJ3248ZRC2qqK7LP3JK8JcqZA nAge8f2sDZIN7lo4mTkcQY/t2VTzdM9h04I2s+ZJbX3UesLWA7aZEyyoXdJB0XL6X8eh vlEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532IwgEpBvhryRygp+/Ye/BKFs56BMH8zq/5Kvz5cWRozfZQgGLu inzxmmB1ifb55iehVFNMeNQFj9no/h6uzC11QChP/lFASWc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSH/by3hKtRHmS11kRgUKlJhZzpXtkxIPQorbgHyF3GAqaIB2a5gha8iVnyx1HsX5VRqIlgKLGhrGGdese4N4=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:9510:: with SMTP id u16mr49285240eda.134.1637951429531; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:30:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:30:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CADaq8jcwxf1ic=_iVHnw4ek-hFhiikgxV8631wiaiCPvgFGraw@mail.gmail.com>
To: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>, nfsv4-chairs <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, nfsv4-ads@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001dda9705d1b5492e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/L1cYJLxrXrzqr7adTLJVqE-NzV8>
Subject: [nfsv4] Future documents related to rfc5661bis effort
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:30:34 -0000

rfc5661bis-03 is probably the last draft before the planned split-up into
intro, discussion, reference, xdr, etc.  I anticipate submission of those
late in Q1 of 2022 and expect to request wg adoption of a subset of those,
including intro, discussion, reference, xdr and possibly others from the
set {msns, pnfs, file-layout}

There will be a security-04 out in about a month.  It will address many of
the issues that Chuck and Rick have already brought to my attention and I
will try to also address comments received in the next week or so as well.

Despite what I said in my slides at the meeting, I will be requesting wg
adoption of security-04.   Zahed, Beepy and I discussed this and decided
that the Consensus Items listed in the document could be discussed and
addressed after wg adoption.  I urge people to read security-03 and advise
me of any issues they might have with document adoption asap.   I'd like to
make sure that any such issues can be addressed in -04.