Re: [nfsv4] IETF101 (or Bakeathon) in March.

Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Fri, 12 January 2018 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4E112E8A8 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 07:34:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.03 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5VKvNfKdgkBJ for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 07:34:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com (aserp2120.oracle.com [141.146.126.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D7C412E89A for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 07:34:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0CFYhoX165453 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:34:43 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=from : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version : subject : date : references : to : in-reply-to : message-id; s=corp-2017-10-26; bh=HFOGk30Rrqvqw5yMkexKn9z2f+c+LUKi5nTs5PQtT6g=; b=wQReqi73DFDpYtZnnp0bLBx5SIvi2gzgj5g/stReKaqZ6G1KDihFBNigCMmF0oFG3qtM TVbpuz90bIMh9MySDSL2LKq3FUktexJXVi8zYNLxztpnQVu9bm9WGIToLYJ13z0KXUkG PEwNYsmlYTpTdcXpL/96Lul2F/XnemGlW1coevcQ3oln7B+PMiLL++AJqwPiyGp3Hgsa iKONe5AKMtc+l9PPxklOMQQo02kQiSrqRdiRvL2rPre23t3/ESIUDs7ZdtciFFDTk2CD aiUQUs+Vnenh3HqoOmKHVNa2f8LfyolJ8ELu1swy/2m5pBaJbX6T9mSCYX3Y1u9irPxs IA==
Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2feysjr01v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:34:42 +0000
Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w0CFSGPf030212 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:28:16 GMT
Received: from abhmp0019.oracle.com (abhmp0019.oracle.com [141.146.116.25]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w0CFSG9N011843 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:28:16 GMT
Received: from anon-dhcp-171.1015granger.net (/68.61.232.219) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 07:28:15 -0800
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:28:15 -0500
References: <CADaq8jcpkGG4RVUqowQvd9DmFaqacwkYLqWW=ioB5U-qjK2rRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jcpkGG4RVUqowQvd9DmFaqacwkYLqWW=ioB5U-qjK2rRA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <DCAFF337-69A6-4C80-8DC7-8F3E1174A93A@oracle.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8771 signatures=668652
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=751 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1801120212
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/Lfq_J35fy96FQnQ1c0SJqtU9w7I>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] IETF101 (or Bakeathon) in March.
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:34:46 -0000


> On Jan 11, 2018, at 3:39 PM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> As some of you may have heard, there is a possibility of a Bakeathon event in late March (in Ann Arbor).  I don't think the planned dates are actually overlapping but they are close enough that very few people will want to attend both if they are both held in March.  I know I would not and would probably go to Ann Arbor if both were held in March.
> 
> Nevertheless, I still think it important for the working group to have some sort of discussion of pending things we are working on so we might well think about one or more conferences calls that we could schedule in that approximate time frame.   I would like us to discuss next steps for the nvme-pnfs work and for the draft-ietf-{mv0-trunking,mv1-msns}-update documents.
> 
> What do other people think?  Is there anyone who would attend IETF101 in London if there were a Bakeathon scheduled for the last week in March?  If not, we might as well decide right now not to meet at IETF101 and figure out how to address our needs for discussion in that time frame in another fashion.

Another way to view it: we seem to be on track to meet our
milestones for 2018, except for "pNFS on NVMe SCSI". I don't
feel a meeting is required to unstick this. The flex files
documents are also progressing.

Are there other issues that might benefit from a face-to-face
meeting in two months?


--
Chuck Lever