IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Potential erratta for RFC7931

Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Wed, 05 October 2016 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <bfields@fieldses.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873491293D6 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 13:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jAC1HtQsfUXy for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 13:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe50:41d6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1905129417 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 13:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 5075C2409; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 16:14:06 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 16:14:06 -0400
From: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20161005201406.GA31283@fieldses.org>
References: <CADaq8jdc+5oLkvaxNkpxm65gH_X8+fGarZLAsq-bgGrUxSYC3A@mail.gmail.com> <20161003151158.GE3324@fieldses.org> <CADaq8jfDdy8CnDGdisq+CwdXYgaUbSOCri2q7KOxo-bCzmC7wQ@mail.gmail.com> <20161004181822.GB15057@fieldses.org> <CADaq8jcjs3K8f+3gxuL_c-WTvPxjXpO5ZO7DFy_+QeoYGuEBrQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jcjs3K8f+3gxuL_c-WTvPxjXpO5ZO7DFy_+QeoYGuEBrQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/MqFxnHSyigL7dlJmBDBY5LKmSDM>
Cc: Bill Baker <bill.baker@oracle.com>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Potential erratta for RFC7931
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:14:13 -0000

On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 04:10:59PM -0400, David Noveck wrote:
> > Sounds good, I'd just delete "at least once" in the above.
> 
> I will do that change.  Since you can't repeat something less than once,
> the change cleans things up while leaving
> the meaning the same.
> 
> "the SETCLIENTID procedure mentioned above needs to be repeated at least
> once" --> "the SETCLIENTID
> procedure mentioned above needs to be repeated"

OK, thanks.--b.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status