Re: [nfsv4] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12.txt

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Tue, 08 August 2017 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B519E13252D; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id owuG2CoxDj-5; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6FD01327AD; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id g35so17325637ioi.3; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 12:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=H+jObzrgg5REIcDy7fMHVaP5WbrvFPGuX01NdDe34nw=; b=AZX56aVPkk+w7NIKFlhizCZbBWo06pVIWSraJnkIqsRRPUDxYQgdOrwknDgMUUef3M D+rGgCtCK2cYC7Vdc9zWFVK/rrY1MCDpQqQ6AW222q2R4TuL1C5K506VLgeDuwVtQX+h YNduAtgGeZ/ss6Z93J6Ma0NPmGnd0e2erkudergz7dYAW6W9KWCQpZC6jHXYazUJv7o1 SW2y/Iwk5PO5BtWyvFYTFoKon1S5ncnSoGbon9lmgB9yebtetovyQf68yLHFx/iR30P2 1Q99WqA6al+c45A79rbGCfNWI5eMd4OX+Sshs1LK1vwVjGeM0NlJndIEAGi/yQNxzk57 /wtg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H+jObzrgg5REIcDy7fMHVaP5WbrvFPGuX01NdDe34nw=; b=aIAjR+Nx/dmyN2dUX9X2kW/+q6bkFZV/XUDWsiGYaKAroB3zNVG5HVWFBFUGbcH7n8 3eeJzOekeUYtbMGfDUNDUqRT18LcmlB9EK5CzsF7ggkqsQU3D77G6vdQOQ88mzubNJdE fr8WQ3uXfMvHDpPgTcEWKBJtoJlsLNBBrguMmtU4pGcGMH5OXP5XXTQrixKq+rGJNFni BeGo9ni4Jcp+88GZ2+ttUtOwlknM77ITZflGZMfeU7DC2XRw/3P4VCJq1/zeXYlOr2GL u3oQQc9uez9/IVWLwq6J9LQ+K8jyEVOoNFkkmUlyEjhWN3XRjACzry7X++N7o8wmDd7r rwHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jFoKHZ63yI0SHURvFJR08ygbNzHukcrBHo07cw9esk0vZX9WGo oT7E1UlWQmBcMPUSCamagBwXW9A0Tg==
X-Received: by 10.107.164.213 with SMTP id d82mr4923011ioj.14.1502219706068; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 12:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.142.72 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8610FE8D-D0D0-4BE5-B5BD-EBE79E9D4C87@oracle.com>
References: <150221736912.12436.8555189528435844625@ietfa.amsl.com> <8610FE8D-D0D0-4BE5-B5BD-EBE79E9D4C87@oracle.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 15:15:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jeQ1LKsH4tf27Jm6hZbFTULT6LQgpZFWcELxY-CHAze1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: "nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org" <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141c536f4a9ea055642c73d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/NFHbO9p6_5m2rCNOXCQ1npV3CQ4>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 19:15:10 -0000

> Please review this revision to ensure the AD's comments have been
> adequately addressed.

The only things I noticed were nits connected with the shift from referring
to NFS RPC (version 2 and 3) "Programs" to making this singular since they
use the same program.  In any case:

   - This has gone from capital to lower-case which doesn't match the rest
   of the document
   - If you scan for the word "Programs", one finds that there a number of
   other places where this is similarly pluralized.

> Considerations section, to be submitted within the next week as
> revision -13.

I'm not a triskadekaphobe but I did kind of wonder.  I looked at RFC8154
(the one that took a year after WGLC to get published) and it turns out to
have been a -10.


On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:

>
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Subject: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12.txt
> > Date: August 8, 2017 at 2:36:09 PM EDT
> > To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> > Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Network File System Version 4 WG of the
> IETF.
> >
> >        Title           : Network File System (NFS) Upper Layer Binding
> To RPC-Over-RDMA Version 1
> >        Author          : Charles Lever
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12.txt
> >       Pages           : 19
> >       Date            : 2017-08-08
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This document specifies Upper Layer Bindings of Network File System
> >   (NFS) protocol versions to RPC-over-RDMA version 1, enabling the use
> >   of Direct Data Placement.  This document obsoletes RFC 5667.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis/
> >
> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> This revision addresses AD Evaluation comments from Spencer Dawkins,
> except for the comment on the Security Considerations section. Some
> additional clean-ups were done which has resulted in section
> renumbering.
>
> Please review this revision to ensure the AD's comments have been
> adequately addressed.
>
> I plan to consider a replacement for the current Security
> Considerations section, to be submitted within the next week as
> revision -13.
>
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>