[nfsv4] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06

Niclas Comstedt via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 27 January 2020 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC6A3A0FB7; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 14:48:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Niclas Comstedt via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <ops-dir@ietf.org>
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.116.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <158016530347.28871.10147402382154053786@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Niclas Comstedt <nco@comstedt.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 14:48:23 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/NZKsmlt2g74ym4dwpzD_gaV64xY>
Subject: [nfsv4] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 22:48:24 -0000

Reviewer: Niclas Comstedt
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Document
editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
comments.

The document is straight forward, clear in what its trying to solve and ready
to go.


/nco