Re: [nfsv4] Verified editorial Errata on 5561 and sesqui-msns

Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@talpey.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28CD3A0BC1 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ntB5wGbQ7eQT for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa12-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa12-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1E6B3A0BB6 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.79] ([24.218.182.144]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id 1B9Mk7NIxXkZh1B9NkwCqY; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:11:21 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=MqEsFFSe c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ugQcCzLIhEHbLaAUV45L0A==:117 a=ugQcCzLIhEHbLaAUV45L0A==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=TRNwVw87zc7CpznVy0UA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: tom@talpey.com
To: nfsv4@ietf.org
References: <HE1PR0702MB3772011E83C71FC05A28983F95700@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <65F221A3-3405-4F2C-99B6-278E8C2C0AD8@oracle.com> <HE1PR0702MB377297EAEE9040F8BDD7046D95710@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <8c6e035a-9b50-f485-794a-54f02619643c@talpey.com> <0D94413C-0FB3-443C-AB5A-8CDBAE6766F7@oracle.com> <HE1PR0702MB37722A819EA66409C9DB20AE95710@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Message-ID: <3132b952-08ec-10bc-aa0b-a365d79966df@talpey.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:11:21 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0702MB37722A819EA66409C9DB20AE95710@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfBaPP7ydWb/3cCMV8VcbB/5NdbEmbCg3tX17lU7hoqVaqHufcIN6REE97vd8AC9xVDK0IOYeYkIW+vmOJ1cIOxmwXKYL4VDdu7Vb3lI6a+Oh0pJJjSv7 PL4Cqf3xJdRE2I81QTDKwmQHdJUy8634AHW5ehhTSRHjjHMS41ZyXneL
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/O58LPlCogjHhjlYczh9uYnISgQ0>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Verified editorial Errata on 5561 and sesqui-msns
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:11:44 -0000

On 7/30/2020 11:08 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:> ...
> So from my perspective the safe path here is to leave 2249 out.

I don't disagree, but one question. Because this is an accepted
erratum, what is the procedure for marking the text as such in
the new document? Do we simply transfer the erratum to the update
and the new landing page says "Errata Exist" ab initio?

Tom.