Re: [nfsv4] NFSv4 personal drafts

"Roy, Dipankar" <Dipankar.Roy@netapp.com> Thu, 15 July 2010 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Dipankar.Roy@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A507E3A6A9E for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RiKW37H3Sw8c for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827D23A6848 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.55,210,1278313200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="403869432"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2010 12:05:40 -0700
Received: from sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com (sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.99.115.27]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id o6FJ5e3m009407; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from btcrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.73.251.109]) by sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:05:40 -0700
Received: from BTCMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([10.73.251.108]) by btcrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:35:35 +0530
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB2450.B4227E09"
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:35:34 +0530
Message-ID: <5FFF8E9361C5D84EBBAF70C1931CDDE305170D23@BTCMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] NFSv4 personal drafts
Thread-Index: AcskULQP4o2mZ9yiTVSD0TWYlK/pmQ==
From: "Roy, Dipankar" <Dipankar.Roy@netapp.com>
To: spencer.shepler@gmail.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jul 2010 19:05:35.0794 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4B51120:01CB2450]
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] NFSv4 personal drafts
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:05:30 -0000

> I see there are three personal I-Ds present that have not been
> discussed at the WG meetings (they don't have to -- just noting it).

> Would the authors of those drafts be kind enough to send
> email to the WG alias with their intent?  Is review or input needed?
> If so, by when, etc.

> Thanks,
> Spencer

Hi Spencer,

Thanks for bringing this up. We are planning to present the draft
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dipankar-nfsv4-pathless-objects-00
at the IETF 79: November 7-12, 2010, Beijing, China.

We would be delighted to have any review comments or input on the draft
before IETF 79.

Thanks
Dipankar