Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Fri, 25 August 2017 17:25 UTC
Return-Path: <bfields@fieldses.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA09126C7A for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aqbQ_KxkyK9a for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [173.255.197.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD05E1321B0 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 91BD227D0; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:25:22 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:25:22 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: spencer shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
Cc: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>, hch <hch@lst.de>, Thomas Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170825172522.GB28124@fieldses.org>
References: <CCE6471D-5252-4313-BDED-5EAA468E3FAA@primarydata.com> <20170823155536.GA10035@fieldses.org> <CAFt6Ba=Ab=TLURRJ9ULdmU_8FydkeijfoHpgzd1bBTtx6YcBHQ@mail.gmail.com> <7824C7CB-FA68-4BC8-BF92-F93B37521B91@primarydata.com> <CADaq8jd51=2fU=jzi-f17E5Yr-0ZJ461uuXC33Ff90YoCsQtDw@mail.gmail.com> <20170824083637.GA19186@lst.de> <5FBC8622-3207-4B5C-A6F6-B90FBD7492D0@primarydata.com> <20170824164508.GA21609@fieldses.org> <CADaq8jdv9thBKqBViR=SEgbiUDe7c3kB_rpbB3w_F43sNFV9Yg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFt6BakwE_p6Fg95GFNK_xF0Ph2TQi8S2xynA44vFBm+cYLrJA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFt6BakwE_p6Fg95GFNK_xF0Ph2TQi8S2xynA44vFBm+cYLrJA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/Sf-13GnI-mkIMLf1EwcflQ6MAYo>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:25:37 -0000
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 09:49:01AM -0700, spencer shepler wrote: > Bruce, > > Do you agree to make changes as per Tom's original request? I can do it, it might just take a week or two to get to it. (Or Tom can send a patch--source is in git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/NFSv4-umask.git.) --b. > > Spencer > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:46 AM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > And I just got a "draft approved for publication" > > > email yesterday so I was kinda surprised there's still time. > > > > It can take a while to get from approval for publication to AUTH48, which > > always > > takes longer than 48 hours. > > > > With 8178, I was pretty lucky in that in that it took only five weeks. > > > > 8154 took over five months. > > > > > Clearly I don't understand how this works. > > > > You are not alone. Just because there will be a delay does not mean you > > are free > > to make changes, even well-justified ones, at any time in that period. It > > is best to > > co-ordinate with the Spencers. > > > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:45 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> > > wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:46:41PM +0000, Thomas Haynes wrote: > >> > > >> > On Aug 24, 2017, at 1:36 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de<mailto: > >> hch@lst.de>> wrote: > >> > > >> >> FYI, I agree with the request - every NFS RFC should be able to > >> >> produce valid XDR. > >> >> > >> >> While we're at it it would be great if we had a way to merge the XDR > >> >> sniplets from the various RFCs so that we can have an official > >> >> combined XDR that we know is valid and can be used as starting point > >> >> for implementations. > >> > > >> > > >> > I did this earlier this week: > >> > https://github.com/loghyr/nfsv42_xdr > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> I think Christoph was looking for something automatic, though? Like a > >> script you could feed RFC URLs to and have it spit out an XDR file. > >> > >> I guess it could be nice, I'm just afraid it may take me a few days to > >> get around to it. And I just got a "draft approved for publication" > >> email yesterday so I was kinda surprised there's still time. Clearly I > >> don't understand how this works. > >> > >> --b. > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > nfsv4 mailing list > > nfsv4@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 > > > >
- [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask spencer shepler
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask David Noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask spencer shepler
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask David Noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask David Noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask spencer shepler
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask spencer shepler