Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in 2011

Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com> Mon, 11 October 2010 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <SteveD@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B82A3A6A44 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.185
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, GB_AFFORDABLE=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id afan5DZXhXCw for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BB63A6A32 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9BDHbKH011014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:17:37 -0400
Received: from badhat.bos.devel.redhat.com (vpn-225-79.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.225.79]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9BDHajH002226 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:17:37 -0400
Message-ID: <4CB30E70.3080200@RedHat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:17:36 -0400
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: nfsv4@ietf.org
References: <9C0FE01C-2ECC-468D-AC32-524191536058@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <9C0FE01C-2ECC-468D-AC32-524191536058@netapp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in 2011
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:16:38 -0000

On 10/07/2010 02:06 PM, Thomas Haynes wrote:
> We've discussed potential venues for having 2 BakeAThons in 2011.
> 
> The dates would be in the middle of June and the start of October.
> 
> There are two different proposals:
> 
> 1) 
> 
> June: EMC, Paris, France
> Oct: NetApp, Sunnyvale, CA
> 
> 2)
> 
> June: CITI, Ann Arbor, MI
> Oct: NetApp, Sunnyvale, CA
Having the it at CITI makes it much more feasible... IMHO..

>From a strictly Red Hat point of view, its much easier and 
affordable for us to send one person to CITI and have 
two people participating verses sending two people to Paris 
France, along with equipment...  

> 
> We are seeing increased demand to host the event in Europe and it should
> be feasible to do so once every 2 years. Between 20 - 25% of our participants
> are based on the other side of the Atlantic. We might also draw in additional
> testers and we all know once an organization gets a taste of testing, they
> tend to continue attending.
So are most of the 20 to 25% based out of Paris? If it was held in Paris,
what would be percentage of people travelling out of country? Meaning would 
only 75 to 80% would have to travelling out of country or would that 
percentage go up to 90 to 95%? If its the latter I see no reason
to move it... 

My two cents...

steved.