IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls WGLC is now closed

Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Mon, 16 December 2019 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF62120902 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:59:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EelFQzZ8pT3K for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:59:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com (aserp2120.oracle.com [141.146.126.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5313E12008C for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:59:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xBGJx0oh155138; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 19:59:08 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=from : message-id : content-type : mime-version : subject : date : in-reply-to : cc : to : references; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=Pvy8rtDpNiqU5hOj8usAJ/ijKAvD/qrpEDPWe3pU3Ac=; b=PhWF89P4ZWWFNyVMGL0aABtS3aAw39ULjGV90jV46dKX1BZ7JV3xSVq/SuWfyQs0dZOc L3TPh0MZPABaciQVOmzqZviF5wI1foI9KJk7mFYbDbWSUrOue09FrhrM3IINgL9FV6I5 z+kr4qQL3rCXGeuq2n0fkUU2Ga8eigcjyvBF7lgPP2GP+iwQs+8LOM7gAc9DaEKZqGUv hy/NeR9J+ErF0Zr7Qp0DjpEB68aK1Up2k2ssodkADRivJLvAbLyEAgCpm6WZFTavDLPP UzEqry2F/LtMkmgwDp6fa/fZhMbeoyba5Hai0vQ92rjC09gsFGWrd07bESX3Y6M4IMMo dQ==
Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2wvqpq1vkx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 19:59:08 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xBGJwv0i147088; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 19:59:07 GMT
Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2ww9vpw0fh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 19:59:00 +0000
Received: from abhmp0001.oracle.com (abhmp0001.oracle.com [141.146.116.7]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id xBGJwHVm018482; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 19:58:17 GMT
Received: from anon-dhcp-152.1015granger.net (/68.61.232.219) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:58:17 -0800
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Message-Id: <19558635-4742-41AC-B37F-464C7D52DAB1@oracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F28AA2E3-E689-43BB-B454-C15D71F0A9D3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:58:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jduCbzg5iAw2rvyO0GHdQgMMEGeb_KW7Hoym_OAsXqScw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>, "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
References: <BB08AAC5-C3FD-4135-A553-18FEC0A14B06@oracle.com> <CADaq8jduCbzg5iAw2rvyO0GHdQgMMEGeb_KW7Hoym_OAsXqScw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9473 signatures=668685
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1912160167
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9473 signatures=668685
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1912160167
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/TchC5UTXjfDano0XkE58QGSgxO4>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls WGLC is now closed
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 19:59:22 -0000


> On Dec 16, 2019, at 2:52 PM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 2:21 PM Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com <mailto:chuck.lever@oracle.com>> wrote:
> Hi-
> 
> Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls closed on Friday Dec 13.
> I request that the Datatracker recognize completion of Last Call.
> 
> I'll do that within the next few days, once we have responses from everyone whose
> comments were incorporated.
> 
> 
> Thanks to all who read through the document and posted comments. I've collected
> the comments in an updated draft. Here is a diff with rpc-tls-04:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls.txt&url2=https://chucklever.github.io/i-d-rpc-tls/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls.txt <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls.txt&url2=https://chucklever.github.io/i-d-rpc-tls/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls.txt>
> 
> David, Tom, could you review these changes and let me know if I've understood
> and correctly applied your comments?
> 
> Tigran, addressing Tom's comments necessitated a change in Section 5.1.1 to
> language that you requested. Please review the changes and let me know if there
> is a problem with the new text.
> 
> I'm willing to wait until year's end for late comments. 
> 
> I'm not.   I assume the people who commented can, within a few days, let us
> know whether the document is ready to go
> . 
> If you have anything to
> add, please don't hesitate to speak up.
> 
> That's very nice of you but I'm not sure how to accommodate late comments once 
> WGLC is officially over, especially if I declare document consensus.

So that's not how it worked for cm-pvt-data. Tom's comments didn't arrive until after WGLC closed, and I was told that there are typically comments that arrive late. Was I misled?

I don't think you can declare a consensus until I provide a fresh revision that addresses WGLC comments?

Not trying to start a fight, but I thought I was doing the right thing here.


> I don't see a need to effectively put off the end of WGLC until 12/31.
> 
> If people have small edirotial nits, you can incorporate them during  IESG consideration.
> 
> If someone comes up with a stop-the-presses comment, they can raise the issue during IETF 
> last call :-(, but I don't expect that to happen.
>    
> 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever

--
Chuck Lever

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email