IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] questions w.r.t RPC-over-TLS draft

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Mon, 27 January 2020 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752133A0CFA for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:14:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29M3-248huGq for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:14:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C473E3A0CF8 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:14:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id e10so12297486edv.9 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:14:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5iBeFzh3ifseUnPeVnp+O2P/jHkfKgN0OAcWk3nA6OY=; b=ASgtzeLiUsjzVnwBtJiQpjbUO7Wgl5b1qOQoB98FI829L0yH4spW2XtzfQUhoRERE3 d6OYhdT8L6uipJ4e6NJ9+t0Nta07/1gK6y9vkupwWhOsoSl+oSVnFd4uMcGT8dU8z/kV tDTL/hp+UvTOOHmcutNWJpgntFlbw4WUwU+A0/zYu2CUefnupPWrEIZ1LzXHizdqyLY5 1BewxCqe5gGoud8e6nAZTDE3nH9P8VRb2N4qADDzml6uClzzKRytSJkoSWbmOU6N8KJ3 Nx1hoM0vAyajRp/HRbDMHpPN1cdo/M3ZW12OhrsKl3ehO3Wnvb6IY9DJBk+cpYoZcg5m NhNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5iBeFzh3ifseUnPeVnp+O2P/jHkfKgN0OAcWk3nA6OY=; b=T2cq/4oFWCXCOFoqQchOTGwiblxR1enUP8Og73Em/jeYTS8aZxKE5DYNAf0WH2BCuH dYYoU5Tl/uP32lAh4TUmfft+pWi6I5xJYsFStNo4zr6SW/l0c2CctdZr+KzgcJEG5sA4 RZoGhJ9MZZAK7VECEgj5H9ZOLawBsqR6Y4TTNm4eI3TWY1JAkMc38fl/aBNvfbrAdeUL sYtM+CAJUsAop/7GScN7i4skwBnzN4bkpKcwlnG/n3xNWPjBIcyEe3C4w4oCbUamrMgg AOxNsKgo8bR8BZSVvTdqwbkvJQyxlny09X0hhQNrJHLboNjNNRt98Nedk0Z1HfGmos9x Hv0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUmsgcjTBBUMPiG//AVnqGVFkU5nb4adq6LuPGJ+2wfq22DBW+M 3pV7mhZrleb+rNTtc99vJp57Zbk8QeFw91FCaOg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwvlkDR56JLAnHz3fkLwYW47pheDafQllMtmbOOJP3PtAhWXapHU0Lfchdb6Cdy3C3so/U9W3FiJeikizCnbbc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:cd11:: with SMTP id oz17mr490458ejb.382.1580159659895; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:14:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <YQBPR0101MB142761C64D6A842CB99EADC0DD320@YQBPR0101MB1427.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <0E8060A0-B8DA-462E-915E-9121824A7A3D@oracle.com> <YQBPR0101MB1427364BAFED4564FD0FD67BDD320@YQBPR0101MB1427.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <0FF8087F-E4C6-4ABB-8F92-6224724939FC@oracle.com> <YQBPR0101MB1427D05C02E7B056BFB59244DD0D0@YQBPR0101MB1427.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <632009682.1567555.1579693972041.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> <YQBPR0101MB14278E78602567233ADE90D1DD0C0@YQBPR0101MB1427.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20200124015406.GF90660@kduck.mit.edu> <YQBPR0101MB1427EC1765AEBD08A2C55A09DD0E0@YQBPR0101MB1427.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <EB385200-1A85-42F7-967C-ADC24875232C@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <EB385200-1A85-42F7-967C-ADC24875232C@oracle.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:14:08 -0500
Message-ID: <CADaq8jfpPOPS2cqzt+7yonLofuc6yCeQPL-YvRaYMQwB10rFmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000376f39059d2597e4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/p7ZRHd15mmsHyjRyk1FNC7Eu2Hw>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] questions w.r.t RPC-over-TLS draft
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 21:14:23 -0000

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 2:23 PM Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:

>
> I'm willing to make some alterations. I don't think we're changing any
> consensus decisions here, so probably the best approach would be for me
> to submit another revision after we resolve the wording issues.
>
> Does that sound right, NFSv4 chairs?


This makes sense. The document is waiting for a write-up which is on turn
is waiting for IPR stuff.

I don't think you are changing consensus decisions but when posting the new
revision, you should give the working group members  an opportunity to
object of they disagree. Once those days are over and I have the IPR stuff,
I can proceed with the write-up.

>
>
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email