IETF Logo Mail Archive

[nfsv4] Re: Interim meeting agenda topics

Pali Rohár <pali-ietf-nfsv4@ietf.pali.im> Sun, 08 September 2024 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <pali-ietf-nfsv4@ietf.pali.im>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E00DC14F69E for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2024 09:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pali.im
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dxYnG6D4Sr2D for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2024 09:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pali.im (mail.pali.im [IPv6:2a02:2b88:6:5cc6::2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB8A6C14F5F7 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Sep 2024 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pali.im; s=mail; t=1725813251; i=@pali.im; bh=fF2ERRKRlNegx4BO/4DxTm8YuvExqlF1KUsiM/ozzic=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nHygaIa7yn8qGXOWwSQSlpfxTHcxVxkOUMyjWjFVqQC0+uyrysf74LeJymmsfBAo/ T3hcx5yFwGHYmRBajjnxQXj7QSgjtA0UpbtexjcSO9RUgpwFDSJ8rUHuq/tpK+tjA7 joH+2p9hfFNXUxkf/yXYPAeT1CqslNgL+U3FKGQY+uw35cNsHwpAQS8dzs+72pScyF YNJO+FZi0TwFfC15wCHsCstMyoLxzwY28+5bGLoD3xhkusKh2QtgjIJZGxLQeMzokn 6NpLaw5QDEssMSoeS+OCNLsecqNBv8nQa4jTlQp2LdxBoyhdIzooevqRMA5umzCy1S QadwESlyBzQIQ==
Received: by pali.im (Postfix) id 89ABFA4E; Sun, 8 Sep 2024 18:34:11 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2024 18:34:11 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali-ietf-nfsv4@ietf.pali.im>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20240908163411.e2vobyl7yhaz6sdt@pali>
References: <F2FA0129-5780-4257-8E18-E04865D6BCC4@cert.org> <CAM5tNy7fhU5s+EufRS3aq2zYSdjrtD_ijj1RgHcTv0WzGcbT0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jey55znu5J1amhRj6F5uwoE=hO81ghEqZtrnsVw=_N5Pw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jey55znu5J1amhRj6F5uwoE=hO81ghEqZtrnsVw=_N5Pw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Message-ID-Hash: OZC7IRJNZGPJATQEJPMWVQPF6JLCKKOE
X-Message-ID-Hash: OZC7IRJNZGPJATQEJPMWVQPF6JLCKKOE
X-MailFrom: pali-ietf-nfsv4@ietf.pali.im
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-nfsv4.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [nfsv4] Re: Interim meeting agenda topics
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/WPk1HArUe8iI6FU5U89abyhw3Ro>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:nfsv4-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-leave@ietf.org>

On Sunday 08 September 2024 12:05:54 David Noveck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2024, 4:35 PM Rick Macklem <rick.macklem@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What is left to be resolved / is controversial on the POSIX_ACL draft?
> 
> Nothing from my point of view.  I don't know of any issues Rick has.   It
> is reasonable to expect that anyone who does have issues to raise them on
> the list.   We may need to confirm the non-existence of such issues at the
> forthcoming interim meeting.  I think we should allocate five minutes for
> this.

Hello, I have already pointed one issue on the list - problem with mode
attribute (two meaning modes: NFS4 and POSIX) and its backward/forward
compatibility on existing NFS4 servers for clients without POSIX ACL
extension.

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status