Re: [nfsv4] NFSv4.2

On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 03:02 +0200, Tom Haynes wrote:
> It was clear in the meeting that we all have an interest in
> getting NFSv4.2 into the charter.
> 
> I think we also don't know what it will look like. We have
> a great starting off point with Mike's document, but we have
> seen some more proposals as drafts since then.
> 
> My view of NFSv4.2 is that it will be neither a large
> document nor a large set of changes to the protocol. It will
> be a collection of small changes with many of them
> being optional.
> 
> I personally do not think there will be much space
> devoted to fixing things in NFSv4.1, because I don't
> envision implementations being far enough along to
> find such interoperability issues.
> 
> Does anyone have another take on what 4.2 should
> be?
> 
> Is the next step getting the requirements document
> updated and resubmitted?
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

If any wordsmithing is needed for the Labeled NFSv4 portion (known as
compliance in the current document) just let me know. Last I looked it
captured one of the use cases for Labeled NFSv4 very well and if calling
it compliance is a compelling way of referring to it I can deal with
that.

Dave