Re: [nfsv4] Verified editorial Errata on 5561 and sesqui-msns

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2903A11D1; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kjSEZk3-aWcF; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR05-DB8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db8eur05on2056.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.20.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F102B3A11CF; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZlhvGegah9akUVTqvgdlEI0f3rdx639RUdBSuJegEKE7GtTue4YU1sqwALoo6kdyW2hJLR05wF8I2RnTJN6ewuTodzwCsht+j616HWlrSM563tw41IbwbvzYgvABKmTXvk3K7LzSTdSsv9qQjtK89ZzkNBO74SdhyG8Cx8qgck0IqB2OOpXA40f97ENh6lbfGxEvoEIEY7yfldMXsnid+oezDBRGpeox7TzCeCcBdkrMlQ+tVBC3mWzXQwGhcyU14qMl7J9eIqOHuJtU5cElhUgfbuzip6jPMRGMVF19lHYc+YNs3Kh1spmVEh4V0nKLl/2Y1EgWCsYI0JIqeJIhDw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=M6ixu/a0AiFW0HvQsG1Er29/tmQ3FbJGvodDAfx92ZU=; b=Z0qTqiJgVQZmIfXbTR8YGG1rJIlCOojWMN1vsDXqOFpmwOAHsZ1R9UJn1msc38KycwdTCUN/eIAubwCAnnePl0jMdLPkjj47TvNId/2/2/N9mz9nEcgugjVQBW8d7zDWmN89/KJefbTW4DnxPbYoW86Uua77XqMN+xVpJ/pdhrAx1AYmNTxiC3LsGjkSd8ufKQk9J3MPvVKWZbDyHPyuHKLXlb7Y9kNpg3ykRtl2mLWmfFXuYOZ25crg4A90twDhK+itua1QAEe+T8LBxn23nLw0EZpAPaQ6K9Wt9NDZ9ZT+aAhoH5GOPLzTjz5CQU2AImusx7r4ENZrhnOHG2RzfA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=M6ixu/a0AiFW0HvQsG1Er29/tmQ3FbJGvodDAfx92ZU=; b=auYNUt19GotxKVLgRSkPqCgElqP5E3BP9Y3v/amFWXUvNdumY9qhS1cOUjydzcT8uOTj8frStJgfmgLujCgBS3fcPXSeqNuR+EWZRSbZLoRmZUD6Z1rdvac8cWNxpbPnPhJg+03fzM6dlOzlcNrxc0XD2P8PWihxQqxMuHbH+h0=
Received: from HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:7:8e::14) by HE1PR07MB3226.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:7:33::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3239.9; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:25:42 +0000
Received: from HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::546c:3b3:9193:3351]) by HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::546c:3b3:9193:3351%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3239.019; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:25:42 +0000
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
To: "chuck.lever@oracle.com" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
CC: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Verified editorial Errata on 5561 and sesqui-msns
Thread-Index: AdZlgsCZ8ZkWECpKQQqlZ6XD/98wHwA6K4sAAARh7MA=
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:25:42 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR0702MB377297EAEE9040F8BDD7046D95710@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HE1PR0702MB3772011E83C71FC05A28983F95700@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <65F221A3-3405-4F2C-99B6-278E8C2C0AD8@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <65F221A3-3405-4F2C-99B6-278E8C2C0AD8@oracle.com>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: oracle.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;oracle.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [2a00:801:2d1:97c9:3d92:4e19:2c50:15d1]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a9da36a0-ad97-4a5d-d299-08d8349470c2
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR07MB3226:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR07MB3226E5920A1C7871CE0E777895710@HE1PR07MB3226.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: qVN4RKErXlrmlenBFOS8gQjzx3KfIF3YzsK/5L/Ba6jolmhVXfvPotsHhrWwSsFt+CPGiZykjDgKJM3LqwI9+SP8sNFBuPwQ5X2AofhfYLawNoRuAgHW5VOM89BdQ/Y42nwn96+36zDYqCUeRJvkvb13/zjNV3MYJynImH6MbCRQ8wLEGrkwFolGCzG4nGwH1a20o+KUUAVUDM6ltn/eIr4P6hi5sP7AtawQS+YWRfxWnlUulKBcolT3e49kF8XV63eNgIyvyVrNXMVE+Tnz7a5zN4ggieTcoiXrC5oLo6k8zBa7Cuf87H/RwFJFekfkd/OPD3ED7I92VqeyKevMiutkpyzsKMmU/7Y4b7RbOrReCROVbxI/B3DO2QLcDSKFDLevJugzOqpE5CUYVcDLQQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(9686003)(6506007)(316002)(5660300002)(7696005)(6916009)(52536014)(54906003)(15650500001)(8936002)(99936003)(71200400001)(8676002)(53546011)(2906002)(186003)(4326008)(55016002)(66946007)(83380400001)(33656002)(64756008)(44832011)(86362001)(66616009)(76116006)(478600001)(966005)(66476007)(66446008)(166002)(66556008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01D6668E.0A8FE540"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a9da36a0-ad97-4a5d-d299-08d8349470c2
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Jul 2020 14:25:42.3615 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Gl7RocVXdFnLrwI/79r1rN0EzhXxox1BNMlikO9XvsLHPUQd1FMxcQZsA8tDN7PPTl5H3OHJXq0nVU8GaoERqm652+/eysMFjTaU+j0Ah0w=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR07MB3226
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/XwZ4NnU6zAs9AMczfspDTNdEOvs>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Verified editorial Errata on 5561 and sesqui-msns
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:25:48 -0000

Hi Chuck,

 

If Errata 2249 despite its status as a verified editorial errata is not editorial then lets leave it out of these changes. I really only want to propose things that are truly editorial and have the potential for cause issues for an implementor using this specification. 

 

Cheers

 

Magnus

 

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> 
Sent: den 30 juli 2020 14:18
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org; draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Verified editorial Errata on 5561 and sesqui-msns

 

Hi Magnus -





On Jul 29, 2020, at 5:01 AM, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com <mailto:magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> > wrote:

 

Hi Authors and WG

 

This relates to the ongoing AUTH48 for draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msnsI

 

I got a question from the RFC-editor about some of the errata filed on RFC 5561. These where two errata that are editorial and verified. They are basically typos or other very basic issues but of potential importance to understanding. And maybe we should include these change into this document instead of continue to confuse the reader. However looking in the Errata list there are more that of this basic type but wasn’t obvious in the copy editing. 

 

The Errata that I think falls into this category are:

 

 <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=2187309c-7f279e51-21877007-86073b36ea28-7eccff51ed56e2f2&q=1&e=343dab95-e554-48c9-9a78-f653c2b76745&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid3558> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid3558

 <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=72c62308-2c668dc5-72c66393-86073b36ea28-54630add5fc8660d&q=1&e=343dab95-e554-48c9-9a78-f653c2b76745&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid2062> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2062

 <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=94ba5266-ca1afcab-94ba12fd-86073b36ea28-60b60d9c5490c0b6&q=1&e=343dab95-e554-48c9-9a78-f653c2b76745&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid2249> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2249

 <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=8da5c41c-d3056ad1-8da58487-86073b36ea28-21dd69a0e0e97c0d&q=1&e=343dab95-e554-48c9-9a78-f653c2b76745&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid2280> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2280

 <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f75faa3f-a9ff04f2-f75feaa4-86073b36ea28-ded42b3464c0a2bb&q=1&e=343dab95-e554-48c9-9a78-f653c2b76745&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid2324> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2324

 <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=e48cd74b-ba2c7986-e48c97d0-86073b36ea28-1ba367ea7b2d71fc&q=1&e=343dab95-e554-48c9-9a78-f653c2b76745&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid2330> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2330

 <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=e2145460-bcb4faad-e21414fb-86073b36ea28-3e737b266ad059ce&q=1&e=343dab95-e554-48c9-9a78-f653c2b76745&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid2548> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2548

 

So the above ones is the ones I wonder if we simply should have the RFC-editor apply before publication? I think this is simply correcting things that the WG knows are wrong in RFC5661 and it could help the reader. I am aware of this is not following what was previous said about Errata, but I think this category should have been included as they appear very straight forward and have been previously classified as relevant for understanding and have risk of causing implementation errors. If the WG participants think we should stick with previous path and not include them I will listen. However, take a look at them before you make that assessment.

 

All of these appear to be errors that might be typically caught and corrected during AUTH48, with one exception:

 

https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2249 <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=8fa96a97-d109c45a-8fa92a0c-86073b36ea28-bf9a924cced2a88a&q=1&e=343dab95-e554-48c9-9a78-f653c2b76745&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid2249> 

 

appears to be technical, and therefore requires review by WG members familiar with implementations of CB_LAYOUTRECALL to avoid protocol changes that would impact interoperability among existing implementations.

 

With the exception of 2249, I am in favor of addressing these minor issues before publication. I do not believe addressing them would result in undue delay.

 

 

There are two Errata that are listed as editorial and verified that are not straight forward nor necessary only editorial

 <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=7f12ac8c-21b20241-7f12ec17-86073b36ea28-ef8e722add5a545a&q=1&e=343dab95-e554-48c9-9a78-f653c2b76745&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid2328> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2328

This appears to an Error code that is missing in RFC5661 and should be listed in Section 15.1.16. This doesn’t have text that can just be applied.

 

 <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=e27bb61d-bcdb18d0-e27bf686-86073b36ea28-9e3f3185e9f7c66a&q=1&e=343dab95-e554-48c9-9a78-f653c2b76745&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid4215> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4215

This Errata appears to fix a unclear statement in fourth paragraph of Section 22.2. However, I don’t see this as Editorial as it changes the IANA procedure even if what is currently written is confusing. 

 

So these I would leave for the proper bis to take care of.

 

Cheers

 

Magnus Westerlund

 

--

Chuck Lever