Re: [nfsv4] IETF 78 NFSv4 session currently schedule for Wednesday afternoon - 1-3:30pm

Tom Haynes <tom.haynes@ORACLE.COM> Tue, 06 July 2010 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <tom.haynes@ORACLE.COM>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD9B3A6844 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.698, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Rl9IcLUXwCU for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com (rcsinet10.oracle.com [148.87.113.121]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3613A6846 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com (acsinet15.oracle.com [141.146.126.227]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id o66HJWIE014700 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:19:34 GMT
Received: from acsmt355.oracle.com (acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id o66EsIc0000888; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:19:30 GMT
Received: from abhmt010.oracle.com by acsmt355.oracle.com with ESMTP id 402274781278436681; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:18:01 -0700
Received: from [10.7.250.88] (/10.7.250.88) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:18:01 -0700
Message-ID: <4C336547.9090504@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:17:59 -0500
From: Tom Haynes <tom.haynes@ORACLE.COM>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100214 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sorin Faibish <sfaibish@emc.com>
References: <F7E65964-7ED7-4152-B6B9-BC5A8C037CEF@gmail.com> <1278194481.2808.9.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <op.vfbl3rx9rwwil4@sfaibish1.corp.emc.com> <AA532B82-0918-47A4-B27F-438B43164EE8@oracle.com> <op.vfb6fqyyrwwil4@sfaibish1.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.vfb6fqyyrwwil4@sfaibish1.corp.emc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155]
X-Auth-Type: Internal IP
X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090208.4C3365A4.0136:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0
Cc: nfsv4 nfsv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] IETF 78 NFSv4 session currently schedule for Wednesday afternoon - 1-3:30pm
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:19:39 -0000

On 07/ 4/10 03:41 PM, Sorin Faibish wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 16:29:44 -0400, Tom Haynes <tom.haynes@oracle.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> That is close to 1/2 of the meeting.
> Not sure I follow: 15+20+30=65 out of 150. Are there other agenda 
> topics that will take
> more than 85 minutes? If so we can make room for all the topics.
>

I'm anticipating more presentations - so close to half on 3 means that 
we have time for
3 more.

>> We either need more time or need to frontload the discussion online.
>>
>> We had talked about both options at IETF 78...
> I just presented the permission draft, now after the discussion in the 
> email we came to a final
> proposal before last call which we want to discuss. As about the 
> storage preferences we have
> to discuss the concrete options we are proposing to discussion before 
> the draft. As you can
> remember we had a lot of corridor discussions that we need to have in 
> the WG. We can reduce the
> time if there are conflicts and time shortage.
>
> /Sorin
>

One of the things I remember was that not everyone had read the drafts
before the event. We talked about assigning readers?

I.e., I'm also suggesting we make sure to read the drafts before we start
talking about them.