[nfsv4] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-nfsv4-06-00: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 16 July 2020 12:24 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <159490227480.30411.2777696271430534501@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 05:24:34 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/YDU_MIhGwiWJFpon78JLQpHiIRg>
Subject: [nfsv4] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-nfsv4-06-00: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-nfsv4-06-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-nfsv4/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Minor comment:

Should the first line be "an IETF standard" rather than "the IETF standard"?

E.g. FTP is not obsolete, and arguably HTTP could also be seen as mechanism for file sharing ...

[nfsv4] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-i… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
Re: [nfsv4] Robert Wilton's No Objection on chart… Magnus Westerlund
Re: [nfsv4] Robert Wilton's No Objection on chart… Brian Pawlowski