[nfsv4] Review comment for WGLC of draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types

Matt Benjamin <mbenjami@redhat.com> Wed, 16 August 2017 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mbenjami@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762C81326A3 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.421
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4tf3c4e1zYTf for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-f50.google.com (mail-pg0-f50.google.com [74.125.83.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 838131326B8 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id y129so26231245pgy.4 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yXwCX08GoIFzHjL+oerBTqbzMHeDj4PhLi//T0fyrh0=; b=W4iFnjGb//OvxlGKsR1ctQh2wBgXDhHD0vLuc5WNm7o/YtE88SFshy2HHsDZXGYaFj 2KvnepfOwmpQnmWqDkBPmVLWvTrRBZmcB0pZLtRToDzSMKbuwbRK733suGFcrekvJfuB hJCku9dluyWXhqAraMfK1sNq/UVHTP0GPaZlk+MFUiVZzcTN0FQY2wzbYJIZfceGTcun nCIAay9H5Ufd7kvzvD148h/0P8LA3YOlUpP2DC+Wz701TuRX/fIe9MHJfzCMN7vbE6RS 5+DRMKOquEh7M66vgLDv3FneogI02TGWoGFOrXQb1xvGxvWe7ABtuOibdPI5gIqqMdb+ 1zSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5iLkLPmxmOi1kkrUp+pSOH+QRf1WzhueFWzZqmNeGhg7QDEiQBj 2z+exVx6sXMCc2tbOX1+bcwauvwWXMPNHGY=
X-Received: by 10.84.147.71 with SMTP id r7mr2752556ple.461.1502907947898; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.162.3 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt Benjamin <mbenjami@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:25:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKOnarn+qU0jaEiFDHbQmPAq=rdAKay6uBCkX+-gxjtUd75Fbw@mail.gmail.com>
To: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/YUSPuRPxDOb00maMFdZxLHEDENY>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:37:10 -0700
Subject: [nfsv4] Review comment for WGLC of draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:25:57 -0000

Hi,

I had one comment on the draft.

In section 2 "Definitions" and again in section 2.1 on the distinction
between Data Server and "storage device," it appears that we should
have something like "access via the NFS protocol" for "access via a
file-based protocol."

Sorry for the limited scope of this review.

Matt