Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 08:39 UTC
Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6CA120169 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 01:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VUTNtVcsxY82 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 01:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr30045.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.3.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 116D212012D for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 01:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gJa9seQjD/WLLUuWkFuLv/zZUC78GIPO9Oet4h5lvYcWNpBGj8YlXiT7fse4R/JB6WAAy7+q/e27Wr9VoPHoup/o6lOTEllTtowhUmLY84gHf0WnnPBoHj05Q8GhUvucash35mQqL38iYdEL4pqifNIEMS+6GgCq42//l3LLFk23N2F4fbRoSudih7ukDuDMid0VXX+iOrhMRh0ZG9PnS9Rs/r/pVbz+E5imP+3Nhxo2zF8CFtVQTWzkEOimeje58RBg3ca5zQpdOEV37NP6Eu/SVaD8nPrycPLcrXVZ1nRV4upUhFQMHtxgNMPMZIIUTRH3xtMWL8UbtF8j4haITQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EHRNj0W7OWTN7hBMamlexwr+liyWfCr8a0LpySN9Ay8=; b=JcwsHfSv537aqK3xQxmfX9u8jR7J682Tn0S9WAfnW9xooxQtJebL2yLztZ42Sf9aOxVOJ3P7jqla1Kf8HMtQQL9GpsLBut9l9T16oIyQ/85daNs++lMiFKi/pzbauicgxXJUY6IPxVEPiAQ7FpxwebEPU3C1E6F8PMsP4x8X3X69ytQHgtKz2mo3b2ygyR32lqAb2HF6pT3hBljgrcINalevRtPrbWqOGqRFQp8XqsO1gUfcK5fxoFwqYSf+liM41qn048hXaRohNtSczRBKrA4n6MoL13o0BsTXFaveyp+92HXXKRR1CU/PGMIjP2HC5KZt64y9JtLI8l3RsYdxwg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EHRNj0W7OWTN7hBMamlexwr+liyWfCr8a0LpySN9Ay8=; b=NmzFWegvtp4Tr5Bz3InkAxVnzs1XArB/mT28Eh98OfmQALt35dAnIJlXYbRopn5Yh3GclU5UR6XKDNvkM27A62Yz7g0Qz6QDa2s20tHesUA5OAXseqpvq31mniQndMDfBWH0euAPSoFJlx5YEKlU7RmU7RqAvudKCKNO8ZFNm8k=
Received: from HE1PR0701MB2697.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.168.188.16) by HE1PR0701MB2811.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.168.97.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2387.14; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:38:58 +0000
Received: from HE1PR0701MB2697.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1d5c:4814:3c1e:b769]) by HE1PR0701MB2697.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1d5c:4814:3c1e:b769%10]) with mapi id 15.20.2387.019; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:38:58 +0000
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
To: "chuck.lever@oracle.com" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
CC: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661
Thread-Index: AdVqCp7Ts3W2piEASQO1GGCm9FbP+ggb4dyAACVfcYA=
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:38:58 +0000
Message-ID: <4f3d0659a842b383f08b8505404f20e988714cfb.camel@ericsson.com>
References: <DB7PR07MB5736124B2F507DA20F317BC195B30@DB7PR07MB5736.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <484BC9B0-BA1A-4D1F-9F2C-3EE953AA6226@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <484BC9B0-BA1A-4D1F-9F2C-3EE953AA6226@oracle.com>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [192.176.1.82]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c380a013-3a39-46d6-9c8f-08d75926c783
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR0701MB2811:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR0701MB281117E4219C78B79EB21E3295650@HE1PR0701MB2811.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 02015246A9
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(376002)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(199004)(189003)(478600001)(6512007)(5640700003)(25786009)(4001150100001)(4326008)(3846002)(6116002)(6246003)(6306002)(256004)(99286004)(14444005)(66946007)(76116006)(66616009)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(36756003)(99936001)(102836004)(71200400001)(71190400001)(26005)(6486002)(186003)(6436002)(966005)(53546011)(6506007)(76176011)(14454004)(229853002)(2906002)(5660300002)(2351001)(305945005)(81156014)(8676002)(7736002)(81166006)(8936002)(118296001)(2501003)(66066001)(316002)(2616005)(44832011)(86362001)(486006)(6916009)(476003)(11346002)(446003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR0701MB2811; H:HE1PR0701MB2697.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: r07ct3qZx6RFLqpN0knOrW0A2EI+CGYq/hXdYJIzNzaGUXxEyfaQM2vTbVP7pOh0ctNRz5go3cZ+dFrfWJk2AM0JD/UPu66pclECHjvglFpniM4IsDP2yXLj5kafpQ0YhITfLRURbF0maxj17QDBo2cFb0CZblcWslhz91yq49onPzUz//2Ia9ViloPJrZGrNH41L/UGSqyBwkkQu6Ig1rHgU3Js/hlu4fw7a/ZoVR3oVXd64pIMG6J7l6cPUsBBozrNkuZT6uCA64RJkyUtQwnWSv61HpnNkDzfq5PM/pwqwiKzBdbmtgoWzdWVWdSEOy+4QuXwmnijU09myOX/EePJbr31lL/kJ3kOeGr5JnLvoo5OfzRZi4s3sp6HsiQDky510A5WyIWlCDYvgn59GanzS3QLFCEAcv4clDs6ZiY8v4K6HlISZsWnUTvzxP0V
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha-256"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-4OZdqKMEhSHWgABJ8zqV"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c380a013-3a39-46d6-9c8f-08d75926c783
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Oct 2019 08:38:58.5635 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: cIQO5akEMOS8Qt+84Ak7BGwQL8EJGWl6sqn8gIRRM/Y1E9CjeaaXZeR1gd1a3K4rwzktmPaKZ7ACCwrLyZOsfRaPHYS6sZshrqwNE9jBQE4=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR0701MB2811
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/ZH3MrmtpxRHalzLvdwI4p14QZJs>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:39:04 -0000
Thanks Chuck, I will wait a week before processing your recommendations to give people a chance to comment on these recommendations. I have processed David's recommendation and three from Bruce Fields. What he sent to me directly was: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 09:54:41AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > > 4572 - Fields > > 4914 - Fields > > 5476 - Fields > > FWIW, those three are all typos that may be annoying but are too obvious > to create any real confusion, so clearly fall in the "Hold for Update" > category. > Having looked at them I saw no reason to wait. Cheers Magnus On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 10:48 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > > > > On Sep 13, 2019, at 4:27 AM, Magnus Westerlund < > > magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > To make progress on two aspects, both ensure that the RFC errata are dealt > > with, and to progress draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-01 I like to do > > the following: > > > > From the discussion it appears that some think that the reported errata > > should mostly be accepted. Based on that I want at least one WG participant > > to look at each errata and public state their opinion on what Status that > > particular errata should be in. Before doing that please read > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/ and the IESG statement on > > errata > > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-rfc-errata/ . > > > > Below you have the list of errata in reported state. When you have looked at > > one and judged, you respond to this email and write below the specific > > errata your recommendation. I will then review that errata to see if I > > concur with the judgment and then make it so. > > 4711 > The text in RFC 5661 Section 15.1.5.5 is clearly incorrect. > Compare with text in RFC 7530 Section 13.1.5.5. > I recommend this errata is assigned status Verified. > 4712 > The text in RFC 5661 Section 6.2.1.3.1 matches the text in RFC 7530 Section > 6.2.1.3.1. Should there be a similar errata filed against RFC 7530? > Should the Notes section of the errata be added to Section 6.2.1.3.2 ? > Are there already server implementations that reject RENAME operations in > these cases, or do all server implementations permit RENAME? > I recommend this errata is assigned status Rejected, and the issues addressed > in rfc5661bis after further discussion. > Additional Editorial correction: The Discussion subsections of ACE4_DELETE and > ACE4_DELETE are missing the word "how". > 5040 > The text in RFC 5661 Section 18.46.3 is inconsistent with the text in Section > 18.50.3. Section 18.50.3 clearly intends to allow DESTROY_CLIENTID to be > submitted as a single operation without a SEQUENCE. > I recommend this errata is assigned status Verified. > 5212 > There was no follow-up discussion of this errata on the mailing list. > Does this errata propose a change in WG consensus? Will existing client > implementations handle an NFS4ERR_ROFS result to LAYOUTGET? > I recommend this errata is assigned status Rejected, and the issues addressed > in rfc5661bis after further discussion. > > > > > RFC Number > > (Errata ID) Section Type Source of RFC Submitted By Publication > > Format Date Submitted > > RFC5661 (2505) 12.5.4. Technical nfsv4 (tsv) Michael > > Eisler TEXT 2010-08-31 > > RFC5661 (2751) GLOBAL Technical nfsv4 (tsv) Ricardo > > Labiaga TEXT 2011-03-21 > > RFC5661 (3379) 18.50.3 Technical nfsv4 (tsv) Asmita > > Karandikar TEXT 2012-10-15 > > RFC5661 (3714) 13.4.4. Technical nfsv4 (tsv) Yuri > > Radchenko TEXT 2013-08-31 > > RFC5661 (3901) 18.43.3 Technical nfsv4 (tsv) Trond > > Myklebust TEXT 2014-02-25 > > RFC5661 (4119) 12.2.10 Technical nfsv4 (tsv) Christoph > > Hellwig TEXT 2014-09-17 > > RFC5661 (4492) 18.17.4 Technical nfsv4 (tsv) David Noveck > > TEXT 2015-10-05 > > RFC5661 (4711) 15.1.5.5 Technical nfsv4 (tsv) Tom Haynes > > TEXT 2016-06-16 > > RFC5661 (4712) 6.2.1.3.1. Technical nfsv4 (tsv) Trond > > Myklebust TEXT 2016-06-16 > > RFC5661 (5040) 18.46.3 Technical nfsv4 (tsv) Jonathan > > Price TEXT 2017-06-12 > > RFC5661 (5212) 15.2 Technical nfsv4 (tsv) NFS4ERR_ROFS > > is not a valid error code for LAYOUTGET TEXT 2017-12-19 > > RFC5661 (4572) 18.35.3 Editorial nfsv4 (tsv) Sai > > Chakravarthy Tangudu TEXT 2015-12-30 > > RFC5661 (4914) 14.3.3 Editorial nfsv4 (tsv) Dylan Simon > > TEXT 2017-01-22 > > RFC5661 (5476) 18.42.3 Editorial nfsv4 (tsv) Tigran > > Mkrtchyan TEXT 2018-08-23 > > > > Cheers > > > > Magnus Westerlund > > _______________________________________________ > > nfsv4 mailing list > > nfsv4@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 > > -- > Chuck Lever > > > -- Cheers Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Networks, Ericsson Research ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Torshamnsgatan 23 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 David Noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Trond Myklebust
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 David Noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Mkrtchyan, Tigran
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661: … Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661: … Trond Myklebust
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Rick Macklem
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Mkrtchyan, Tigran
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Rick Macklem
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Trond Myklebust
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Rick Macklem
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Mkrtchyan, Tigran
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 David Noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661: … Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Trond Myklebust
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Rick Macklem
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Rick Macklem
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Chuck Lever
- Re: [nfsv4] Progressing RFC errata for RFC 5661 Magnus Westerlund