[nfsv4] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-40: (with COMMENT)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 14 January 2016 23:48 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C961A8706; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:48:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.12.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160114234846.14296.53886.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:48:46 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/_2pFs_KmMCzif_w2yrXKT86fADA>
Cc: draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x@ietf.org, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: [nfsv4] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-40: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:48:46 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-40: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To be honest, I can't offer much commentary on the 80 odd pages of XDR. I note that the sheperd's writeup says "“Verified XDR provided in documents is appropriate and aligns with XDR syntax and standards.” I'm not sure if that means manually verified or mechanically verified. (Hopefully the latter.) The IANA considerations delegate to [I-D.ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2]. But the IANA section there only contains a reference to RFC 7569. Maybe this draft could directly reference the RFC, or just say "No IANA considerations."?
- [nfsv4] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf… Ben Campbell