[nfsv4] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-40: (with COMMENT)

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 20 January 2016 17:03 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160120170339.23619.19564.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:03:39 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/apZJNMBD7qTS8ybYOFNdhb1NPtA>
Cc: draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [nfsv4] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-40: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-40: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am, of course, as confused as the rest of the ADs who have commented
about the relationship between 4.0, 4.1, and 4.2. If that could be easily
explained in the first part of the document, great.

[nfsv4] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ie… Spencer Dawkins