Re: [nfsv4] Linux pNFS status meeting 07/08
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Fri, 09 July 2010 03:09 UTC
Return-Path: <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9C13A68D8 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 20:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.274
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.274 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WVpj326aHFzQ for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 20:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out1.uio.no (mail-out1.uio.no [129.240.10.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907AF3A67FA for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 20:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx2.uio.no ([129.240.10.30]) by mail-out1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>) id 1OX3xq-0003x3-TE; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 05:09:22 +0200
Received: from c-68-40-206-115.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([68.40.206.115] helo=[192.168.1.29]) by mail-mx2.uio.no with esmtpsa (SSLv3:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) user trondmy (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>) id 1OX3xq-0001LU-0N; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 05:09:22 +0200
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: sfaibish <sfaibish@emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.vfj1i5vyunckof@usensfaibisl2e.eng.emc.com>
References: <OF60B406A7.E52268C8-ON8825775A.000C6BD9-8825775A.000C8A46@us.ibm.com> <20100708154802.GB19375@fieldses.org> <op.vfi7ssfcunckof@usensfaibisl2e.eng.emc.com> <20100708160637.GC19375@fieldses.org> <20100708174558.GE19375@fieldses.org> <op.vfj1i5vyunckof@usensfaibisl2e.eng.emc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:09:17 -0400
Message-ID: <1278644957.3148.5.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 (2.30.2-1.fc13)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 5 msgs/h 1 sum rcpts/h 12 sum msgs/h 1 total rcpts 606 max rcpts/h 20 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 0EFA08B30E85F7648D4F4AEA461AC6470CBD8228
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 68.40.206.115 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 257 max/h 6 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>, nfsv4 list <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Linux pNFS status meeting 07/08
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 03:09:24 -0000
Hi Sorin, I'm getting a 'There are no rooms available for the dates you specified' reply when I try to book for the dates 10/4 to 10/8 using the link you provided on the web page below. Should I be using a special booking code? Cheers Trond On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 22:36 -0400, sfaibish wrote: > I posted a preliminary web page announcement for the Fall Bake-a-Thon in > Boston > on CITI website: > > http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/citi_bakeathon/15th_nfsv4_bakeathon.html > > > On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:45:58 -0400, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> > wrote: > > > Also I'd like to hand off running and taking notes on this meeting to > > someone else for a while. (Benny, maybe?) Or we can go back to making > > the meeting more informal if that's preferred. > > > > --b. > > > > 1. upstream status/merge plans (trond, bfields) > > - upstream at 2.6.35-rc4. > > - server side: some bugfixes merged to callback code; allocation > > failures changed to return DELAY. > > - discussion of error return on client callback-parsing error. > > - trond: everything from before bakeathon is in nfs-2.6.36 > > branch or upstream. Also some file locking bugfixes > > (bugzilla.kernel.org #14501). Also sending release_lockowner > > more often to keep server resources down. > > > > 2. State of pNFS tree (bhalevy) > > - working on patches from boaz and andy for release branch. > > Anyone else have big pending patchsets? > > - Jim is getting complex-volume block patches tested, > > will send them out soon. > > - Fred has some pending stuff ("minor cleanup") > > - next week would like to start cleaning up and squashing > > together patches. Also will truncate some of the history. > > > > 3. Client > > 3.1. Client pNFS status > > - Andy needs to look at state reclaim stuff? > > - Andy still wondering what to do with the nfs inode > > layout pointer. What's the lifetime of the thing that > > points to? > > 3.2. Client state management design documentation (trond) > > - Also, on docs: Andy will check that wiki docs are > > uptodate. And will do some more documentation of > > refcnts, as will Fred. > > > > 4. Server > > 4.1. Todo's for minimal 4.1 server (bfields) > > - still working on callback changes. Trond notes > > ongoing rpc code improvements may allow us to do much > > of this by keeping a single client and modifying its > > transports, in which case I may be able to replace my > > callbacks with single rpc tasks. > > - also fixing 4.0/4.1 bug that prevents exclusive locks > > on upgraded open. > > 4.2. pnfs > > - pnfs/gfs2 > > - I'll ask Eric for a report on gfs2 bakeathon > > testing. > > - exofs > > - I'll ask Brian about citi exofs setup status. > > > > 5. boston bakeathon > > - October 4-8. > > - Details are finalized, to be posted soon. > > - If your company will be bringing large equipment, let Sorin > > know. > > - If anyone would be interested in sponsoring a reception or > > other addition to the bakeathon, contact Sorin. (Or if you > > know who at your company would handle such a thing, let Sorin > > know.) > > > > 6. new business > > - Sorin asked Trond for summary of layout-commit discussion. > > Discussion ensued. > > > > 7. next meeting > > - next week as usual. > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > > > >
- Re: [nfsv4] Linux pNFS status meeting 07/08 sfaibish
- Re: [nfsv4] Linux pNFS status meeting 07/08 Trond Myklebust
- Re: [nfsv4] Linux pNFS status meeting 07/08 Sorin Faibish