IETF Logo Mail Archive

[nfsv4] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rfc5662bis-04.txt

Pali Rohár <pali-ietf-nfsv4@ietf.pali.im> Thu, 05 September 2024 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <pali-ietf-nfsv4@ietf.pali.im>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C312C14F5E8 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 09:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pali.im
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eorzjw2g7Su5 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 09:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pali.im (mail.pali.im [IPv6:2a02:2b88:6:5cc6::2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A043C14F615 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 09:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pali.im; s=mail; t=1725553688; i=@pali.im; bh=4k5+cjYA5mvQ+i2HpPe04iUKi6KTtHlCZ7IUXm7mBZc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AYnjeKrEg8zQZC381K+yBucQsn2QfstXMfjxfs4oZgseSojQieyBQv8DgcxpniPIp 6E3h3XNTtDUw02yiG8n7lm9PE6HICdFiMyTeHgB+atHyEvCuY/j3IejE7Yr+XFWGQP V4i8psLZ10+r2OXaHIvCTIHjl9Cf0UWbFf84edn08livyW11cBwS4D4rtPexqZS3L5 qArj7+UwDBFMQz2SzFw47D9B72YTPAVsGL33x74mGOxE9ucqWEHV1FivQoUBG4KSup 8gjwegp2FTd1+FUGO10hiQmI5CeMj3XN5y2sT8Qs/9UBXeF6N0RyUHA7AVm59YNW+p iRgLMf9xWV2eQ==
Received: by pali.im (Postfix) id 4B5474AB; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 18:28:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 18:28:08 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali-ietf-nfsv4@ietf.pali.im>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20240905162808.lirs2sbomsmapphh@pali>
References: <172555139021.1888861.10953648993322689173@dt-datatracker-68b7b78cf9-q8rsp> <CADaq8jdwHnEJaNASK1no4je1fBguY+wyZNfH-kThWArzaReUcg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jdwHnEJaNASK1no4je1fBguY+wyZNfH-kThWArzaReUcg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Message-ID-Hash: JLWZE4MPLFRIMNNU5OVQZBX3MACGPMUO
X-Message-ID-Hash: JLWZE4MPLFRIMNNU5OVQZBX3MACGPMUO
X-MailFrom: pali-ietf-nfsv4@ietf.pali.im
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-nfsv4.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [nfsv4] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rfc5662bis-04.txt
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/gIdUogsfRky1FSpLMixlj7MueUM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:nfsv4-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-leave@ietf.org>

Hello David, could you look at errata reports which I sent for RFC5662?
It would be nice to review them and incorporate fixed into new bis document.
Pali

On Thursday 05 September 2024 12:09:32 David Noveck wrote:
> IIRC, an earlier version of this draft was supposed to be going through the
> adoption call process, starting "at or before" IETF120.  If there is some
> reason/issue explaining why it has not been adopted, I need to get an
> explanation of that so that I can address whatever issues exist, allowing
> us to make progress on the respecification effort.
> 
> This case is much better than that for the security document, which has
> lingered in the adoption-requested-but-no-response state for about two
> years, but we need to avoid a repetition of that situation,  I think the
> chairs need to follow up on all the documents for which adoption has been
> requested, in a reasonable time, which has not been the case.
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Date: Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 11:49 AM
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rfc5662bis-04.txt
> To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
> 
> 
> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rfc5662bis-04.txt has
> been
> successfully submitted by David Noveck and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:     draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rfc5662bis
> Revision: 04
> Title:    Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 External Data
> Representation Standard (XDR) Description
> Date:     2024-09-05
> Group:    Individual Submission
> Pages:    79
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rfc5662bis-04.txt
> Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rfc5662bis/
> HTMLized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rfc5662bis
> Diff:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rfc5662bis-04
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>    This document provides the External Data Representation Standard
>    (XDR) description for Network File System version 4 (NFSv4) minor
>    version 1.
> 
>    It includes protocol extensions made as part of respecification
>    effort for minor version 1.
> 
>    It obsoletes and replaces RFC5662.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status