Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in 2011

Thomas Haynes <thomas@netapp.com> Thu, 07 October 2010 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <Thomas.Haynes@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A00C3A6DD4 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.134, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id limmnFuI1Fk2 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B1E3A6F9B for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.57,298,1283756400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="464271638"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2010 11:31:12 -0700
Received: from sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com (sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.99.115.27]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id o97IVBTD022470; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtprsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.100.161.115]) by sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:31:12 -0700
Received: from RTPMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([10.100.161.111]) by rtprsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:31:10 -0400
Received: from jeschke1-lxp.hq.netapp.com ([10.58.48.153]) by RTPMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:31:09 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--1068578796
From: Thomas Haynes <thomas@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CAE0DCF.7060002@panasas.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:31:06 -0400
Message-Id: <3415AD24-8A9C-4A96-8CF9-C6BE4F231FEE@netapp.com>
References: <9C0FE01C-2ECC-468D-AC32-524191536058@netapp.com> <4CAE0DCF.7060002@panasas.com>
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2010 18:31:09.0821 (UTC) FILETIME=[CFFD9AD0:01CB664D]
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in 2011
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:30:20 -0000

On Oct 7, 2010, at 2:13 PM, Benny Halevy wrote:

> On 2010-10-07 14:06, Thomas Haynes wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> We need to reach consensus on the venues by the middle of February. That
> 
> Would rough consesus work? ;-)
> 
> Benny
> 

As long as I am acknowledged to be the WG chair.