[nfsv4] Re: Gunter Van de Velde's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-layoutwcc-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 09 January 2025 06:45 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D2CC151079; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 22:45:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Jw6GETzUoc1; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 22:45:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2ECDC151063; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 22:45:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5d3f28a4fccso628926a12.2; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 22:45:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1736405156; x=1737009956; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=E/57z0WShzkJre4YATBFzZWUYFrGcX6NPgUjb65Tf6w=; b=hpT+Mjvm8zjbQp6YZwt/CkFt00NAV85nmIcdLHEfuLMO4bsKYXHzMDkKiTeqbNppMq wgbC0go9eJT6ib4a2Rpt3InYhjIDc6owc6av6WKWkyVMvl1/9s960bjvBD7ItlIQf8qQ HjqpBgq8oLUGnbaafNnH7IA36gHoo1vRWc9UF7xHQGG/NXvqRHVRgyxBBYkmJEjl7pS7 k/PmQoOcWdB1QdgoBrQWatfGCCu1AQPaMKEnIHDNrHVCz92sddhxoH4NyGg574+znIxY upqazjH14iHDNmwHOIMNWOLt8LMBofsW5DUrlH572trxDEaFY6Akb44zqvTBalzD4OUN WIyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736405156; x=1737009956; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=E/57z0WShzkJre4YATBFzZWUYFrGcX6NPgUjb65Tf6w=; b=rrjNCChWdfTMy5/PFbIBgpy+p/qMyryED6Z3N1x3GJFBAvjLoXzqZeoasLT5IYV88F DYHCk1dGj3YMqkA5QSMrX82Rp1VrUNx//qjoSo/24cZHJCnZ7oTHsJqWRemEcb3VpPrg X9qkho0Ueo6GFhzxwJFHG9atqTkq5z7l31no9aEin6e8wm/Ssz+xDu9P6lrPB4UvsYVZ W8s3cjmMxox0P6RvvUcqmQ1mWVlOjr2+Od+ttuftxBqK1qEATngXFP3NARxpX+nI42Sb /uFoB1Crf+xv5E5IddJ3XR/w8xyzulzSwbUSs1U3pfCcpQRshGWGiC1QqSsdz7TS9OMn 9iYg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWmNEetNNaoAMC5j2HbXbnB+rn58RyWrhT+0uwF8KzdKLiyPhoalIJGeFjXOsXwzdBZ5dWQKVYeVpWMIh/XoChtZXkpkS64pn0hIw==@ietf.org, AJvYcCXOcYMwK8Q3HTVwR+w05lXzm7iXzn4aENkvHfm3Tok2KiPmurTZunvWVjGlLKKoTySXhcpPEiPefcQZUbYp@ietf.org, AJvYcCXf9nabu41+fQdmTwkneqvY7bZN9ApcntE9i+aQI2YfnKJfoGRfzV2InYJZ3yrwn+xHAw4fOHQ=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyNbESFv2uuAcC+Mggh1tRLbFTiXEM3prEr3hXytC69Z4JEsSUj 5VV6jchqfGGr9RpBb3x7ahnF/dvVmndFXRp9W/69UtzERgYCn3OB7jVYu3l1LJi862InJXX1m9v 1nZFnvpzWzuGGP6uiuAs5zWTVjRo=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvssCVoUzDkFp4MDJNgZXcLUfDrHevx86ofnZBnr5qkasKDSqd1LYxGrSNERIB BGzWa9fesQXpm6Kc3qiJCzx+x36l+YN+4EyTOINdCmdLduDs4qTTTaA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHHnU7rgZc6WAx3i8ULUYovX0fw2ddbNpZzqEn4QMRfWJE3E0/YptRaqZ756tpvuMLGCIUlRdauSXm5849EPew=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:968e:b0:aa6:7662:c56d with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ab2ab709415mr451132266b.30.1736405156118; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 22:45:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <173616823022.1843766.10743657654524313983@dt-datatracker-65f549669d-2xld9>
In-Reply-To: <173616823022.1843766.10743657654524313983@dt-datatracker-65f549669d-2xld9>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 22:45:43 -0800
X-Gm-Features: AbW1kvaudKVVeWpdOnQ8dJU2bXQiFDLfDbS9FRTtab9Jzt1BvqjVUq448dbjp5w
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZNygJM2k5hEGCpEZRhjeaNbuyjyzsKvSfUF6Gri+BrpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gunter Van de Velde <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000844b25062b4054d7"
Message-ID-Hash: QLOTBAYJ7BOBT4MV72OWBZILXBYEZRWN
X-Message-ID-Hash: QLOTBAYJ7BOBT4MV72OWBZILXBYEZRWN
X-MailFrom: superuser@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-nfsv4.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-nfsv4-layoutwcc@ietf.org, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [nfsv4] Re: Gunter Van de Velde's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-layoutwcc-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/hfCM0YxKPn5WCwwrO8zRerIFiao>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:nfsv4-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-leave@ietf.org>

On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 4:57 AM Gunter Van de Velde via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> #DISCUSS
> #=======
>
> # In the IANA section is written that there is no action required, but
> line 244
> and 245 seem to indicate that there is a code point allocated for
> lowa_type.
> Maybe i got confused and misunderstood the text, or maybe the needs to
> describe
> the intent more accurate for NFS unware people as myself?
>
> 244        The lowa_type is defined to be a value from the IANA registry
> for
> 245        'pNFS Layout Types Registry'.
>

I think what they mean is: The "lowa_type" value is expected to be a value
that was previously added to this registry, not that it's making a new
registration.

-MSK