Return-Path: X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4403A09B5 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:03:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.096 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UvDNYIc8S7nG for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D73A3A0905 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id l12so2234419ejn.10 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:03:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UnU6lfyB1i8OF4QvzJBsXnnJuFynkRx+hcX2RpHkoto=; b=MQ9FS6CI5Vzw5WUVBYCdIvtvplrg7EC0MCvQXZy7I5reSfV7aBWsSHKFvcPI3KSM1M Er4ExX1tmEOlHNEaaVAHEAQ/ltsugpn9RTuO5dh/BQF30hFTLSgkQNUekWuZJPi+4+kf 4zQPPi/9E047WXHQmEMCe45q8HLVAYvKrw0TmX4E3sE+LLA71QwENJqKFRLPdVo1CxMd 2Di+tOb91Qte6AKx6yC2G5FqgbSNWpof3621uHJVofBUz9GKZiznYD2iRYIzNeSswE2M Cpk2+T+Zo8uZi2bunGtteDVodB6Q05lZ17iKplfpB3W0cKrFnR+qCz7V8zC8nxgrotvF hNuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UnU6lfyB1i8OF4QvzJBsXnnJuFynkRx+hcX2RpHkoto=; b=WSv+n2Rke7+DVOI+/auX85VKgm7lM/ihEaIRAqcmnZYKManFdRRK+7g8amdDbMrQj9 AIQPWyY+JBBOs0+y8szh81RTWRekejs/YurgWS1hFzpoHLn1j4ZJIGh30v5UXqyLpsJc ApVkcSVth1SkeaCjJmEKQp7cduqq0zLnmrryE8drTkYW/RODKifiuVLhZsVYVQmsXjuR eFZTEjD/6qilWGuvsHL7h6Qq4brWiNRuNmNJDkFF/FOOPvp75ZVGdpxvo8AEEEfcff4N BkrIq/Mr4+Z3HevUxnDvpQEkZa3QYMVMd9U7CyCW5S2gjxbnFl11vgWu87B8fEwTTsM5 lTTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nLfsBw7tPlD+d0NmzMTH79sdhXCyzl2RVcJFsL6DXdH8fBBeq IxfZVI+7hx/uYzRINt6yeHFEVSwAnQUCknxSEEU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzCHYnOVTKjvh+DLrWvE5Uw7JTkEOoezevk3D8wKaTCmpwwd5uFiJsC9wa9hVqenMU7F1omKV+HuJYTIFERqjI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:4240:: with SMTP id oi24mr2930698ejb.127.1591790599779; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:03:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3270C7FA-0902-4913-992F-7B046AEE12A3@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Noveck Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:03:07 -0400 Message-ID: To: Tom Talpey , Magnus Westerlund Cc: NFSv4 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000041b9b405a7b9a1d1" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Meetings in July or After X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:03:23 -0000 --00000000000041b9b405a7b9a1d1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 6:31 PM Tom Talpey wrote: > On 6/8/2020 2:41 PM, David Noveck wrote: > > Should there be an item in this category to discuss the RDMA Flush > > document? > > > > Good point. There should be. Tom might not have anything more to say, > > but even he doesn't, wE will need an update from Magnus about how the > > necessary charter update process is goIng. > > As I mentioned in my presentation, I'm waiting for the outcome of the > charter discussion before moving the draft forward, and continuing the > discussion, in NFSv4. I don't view either of those to require a meeting. > Understood. So I suppose we could use some time for Magnus to explain to the group how this is going, unless he prefers to deal with this via email. > > Tom. > > _______________________________________________ > nfsv4 mailing list > nfsv4@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 > --00000000000041b9b405a7b9a1d1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 6:31 PM Tom Ta= lpey <tom@talpey.com> wrote:
On 6/8/2020 2:41 P= M, David Noveck wrote:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Should there be an item in this category to discuss= the RDMA Flush
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0document?
>
> Good point.=C2=A0 There should be.=C2=A0 =C2=A0Tom might not have anyt= hing more to say,
> but even he doesn't, wE will need an update from Magnus about how = the
> necessary charter update process is goIng.

As I mentioned in my presentation, I'm waiting for the outcome of the charter discussion before moving the draft forward, and continuing the
discussion, in NFSv4. I don't view either of those to require a meeting= .

Understood.=C2=A0 =C2=A0So I suppose = we could use some time for=C2=A0Magnus to explain to
the group ho= w this is going, unless he prefers to deal with this via email.
= =C2=A0

Tom.

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
nfsv4@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
--00000000000041b9b405a7b9a1d1--