Re: [nfsv4] 4.0 trunking

"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Tue, 20 September 2016 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <bfields@fieldses.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A984612B2A4 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 06:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.218
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.218 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pUDtJNWgSoWR for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 06:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [173.255.197.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AA712B1B7 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 06:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 2A0E6240A; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:28:23 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:28:23 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160920132823.GA12789@fieldses.org>
References: <20160907212039.GA6847@fieldses.org> <CADaq8jfiRU7DTRYXGHZvMALAZWeRjhqcpo8Si3_diMt_5dNSMw@mail.gmail.com> <20160908010532.GA10658@fieldses.org> <CADaq8jcnananUPDHH4Vzhv93JTxZegsZLMCtZWFD-keHheKvHA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jcnananUPDHH4Vzhv93JTxZegsZLMCtZWFD-keHheKvHA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/l0whKFpkb2wg8aXtBMniuWChlZk>
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] 4.0 trunking
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:28:25 -0000

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 03:38:29PM -0400, David Noveck wrote:
> - If there are servers out there whose practices are significantly
> more troublesome than the ones you describe, we need to find out soon.
> Given that many of those responsible for v4.0 implementations may not
> be reading this list, I suggest we discuss this at the October
> Bakeathon.

By the way, that'll be more useful the more server implementations are
represented.  Last I heard I think we have Linux, Primary Data, and
Solaris, and I'm not sure about anyone else (Ontap? EMC? Windows?).

--b.