[nfsv4] Errata report 4118

[David Noveck <[e-mail]>]

As part of producing rfc5661bis-03, I am trying to address the few errata
reports that have not been dealt with yet.  I would be able to apply your
proposed text as-is with one unfortunate issue:  Your replacement text
"ndc_immediate,
which SHOULD be ignored by the client." uses "SHOULD" in a way not
consistent with RFC2119.

As possible replacements, I would suggest the following alternatives:

   1.  "ndc_immediate, which is be ignored by the client."
   2.  "ndc_immediate, which should be ignored by the client."
   3.  "ndc_immediate, which is best ignored by the client."
   4.  "ndc_immediate, which has no effect on the actions to be performed
   by the client.

Please let me know your preference in the next few days so this can make
it into -03.

This leaves three errata, two of which have the status REJECTED,  to
discuss at the 4/9 interim.