[nfsv4] IETF101 (or Bakeathon) in March.

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Thu, 11 January 2018 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15F61200B9 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:39:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LzKMataGqrns for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:39:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3790F124207 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:39:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x229.google.com with SMTP id k18so3401419ioc.11 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:39:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fuopXGl+jhndP6yoVwJw/1XDClc4M6/vnj3r2T+Dyn0=; b=pyMBbPrXfo3TJlq0r2eJnQaqSnpPsZHEvA3UPmQZK9KQMzMNIkXsmXgP49ApDEqSjO K9uS5LvWQAkeD4kJ/UzBj+Gu4GFo990vxLAa8VXTaVPlCZ4vjcqs4Vgo0pV5CQl9bnWt YT46vLuT1n3g3nfP8bMB66aTolxjPVHSrOb7cfhOEB7blI3OibvDBnzL4nOezgSqh3cg 6DFGP9x1Bym7VBjX9voq1brMOw9UIGVOzi+7XtMzO4HfiZbsWv9veAHhubYnkRfgwl/w T9vHWNtqtinocT0ioGNKW+3cmEf1Tt+zP4eVRgGU9a9bVOaJ/p9OQtMUWvq0f19FqO9i 1esQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fuopXGl+jhndP6yoVwJw/1XDClc4M6/vnj3r2T+Dyn0=; b=DdBcG31MUrDJntPIHeEKfp0e15iiqXf9tQWlIV6EgcZhwaS7aawERme7Mb7gEJtSdQ KCaDJUrsy7TrVasxzbNp56jLZvqUBklOXEtF5H5xnLF7hl0uegJ7B0TBllCcGtZFjHUA J3XMg4kl+1j2eB+uSiJ59wHy7LQ7P7PMOG03ApHE7R8VLywij79o0laN31gBuwrfGNYK RJmdIZ55GAiS9VuCnBUub18KKoV9R8DsS8bjlnScLPd6UcKrpRAlnn89yYX2T1ni6W7J g6bjaPfCgRMLRyBKntOMLGDMw3Ib7OiYvD3LJzwbSnwGrEe4NaX3g7wWgKjpGy7JIuAF hl+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytd1roJ1OctQj7wtDh6+NDURFtcSAERj/B3AO514oEVnjy4piESi h92ymAAPJ++JbXzWBRxbOtkMPpRzMX2Dz7VTcvk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotGR7BX/gFtB3vfhVGhN024QXIIlqpQC/8FDx3SBgYCp5yOvn2+CB3DeomwhTYpBoZ1/JMeBWztM3AiZ95iNdE=
X-Received: by 10.107.190.68 with SMTP id o65mr22950454iof.286.1515703165091; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:39:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.50.85 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:39:24 -0800 (PST)
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:39:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CADaq8jcpkGG4RVUqowQvd9DmFaqacwkYLqWW=ioB5U-qjK2rRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114f3646bd8c3e0562862467"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/lnH3CAqEb50SJxNF3bcOA6vuapg>
Subject: [nfsv4] IETF101 (or Bakeathon) in March.
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 20:39:29 -0000

As some of you may have heard, there is a possibility of a Bakeathon event
in late March (in Ann Arbor).  I don't think the planned dates are actually
overlapping but they are close enough that very few people will want to
attend both if they are both held in March.  I know I would not and would
probably go to Ann Arbor if both were held in March.

Nevertheless, I still think it important for the working group to have some
sort of discussion of pending things we are working on so we might well
think about one or more conferences calls that we could schedule in that
approximate time frame.   I would like us to discuss next steps for the
nvme-pnfs work and for the draft-ietf-{mv0-trunking,mv1-msns}-update
documents.

What do other people think?  Is there anyone who would attend IETF101 in
London if there were a Bakeathon scheduled for the last week in March?  If
not, we might as well decide right now not to meet at IETF101 and figure
out how to address our needs for discussion in that time frame in another
fashion.