Re: [nfsv4] WGLC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-02

"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Thu, 08 December 2016 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <bfields@fieldses.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D4B129706 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:00:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ylqNrmspzvRH for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe50:41d6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2641B129594 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id CEFEE2F0F; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 17:00:32 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 17:00:32 -0500
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20161208220032.GC26583@fieldses.org>
References: <CADaq8jcDbT=TYPEYXkFHV3pEG465WNyABX=JP=89oOAORZ+bGA@mail.gmail.com> <20161208215253.GA25054@fieldses.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161208215253.GA25054@fieldses.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/mjhpB7LLJiJCH2TJUt1e9bWpAbw>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] WGLC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-02
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 22:00:53 -0000

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:52:53PM -0500, bfields wrote:
> Thanks for the review.  I ignored or reworded a couple suggestions, but
> don't think there's any substantive disagreement.
> 
> Also I still need to figure out what if anything to do about the xdr.

For what it's worth, current state is at:

	http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=bfields/NFSv4-umask.git;a=summary

so e.g. you can browse changes to source from this review at:

	http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=bfields/NFSv4-umask.git;a=commitdiff;h=0ac2b3d9cbc28b3cfc508dad86c6d89288e98b3b

--b.