Re: [nfsv4] IETF 107 Agendas needed in early March
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Fri, 14 February 2020 14:57 UTC
Return-Path: <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6674A1200CC for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 06:57:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IWNwv8O3lvdN for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 06:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com (aserp2120.oracle.com [141.146.126.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E52781200B4 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 06:57:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01EEnFnU049946; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:57:26 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=content-type : mime-version : subject : from : in-reply-to : date : cc : content-transfer-encoding : message-id : references : to; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=jjaol7U3gxjZlOfMYxRwN2KGYeTfAUkig5KB3PjERFA=; b=Ro2iCyMZwV0d7Jg7V4yMnPw7oOZlHJjS5rApnf/hxnHaemclAxIMRIH4jsFUNsPT0IaL Kr2fMMfpoSIZfhZTQkBSP+LtfjmYoeGPo7kAZMgVcbELnHTvcjp2IpN2RJeTpWrsbhPh axMygW7NDCPHsP+N9jsT2K158pZu6e/K70i+i66OUwymgDtl3J0zHoAPA24CLFFm2MUa F5OdK9viLPGcB8vysPmGWFjco56InebFNqqwk4o6Z3FKfjhVueCNSPa/03tpK48VgUbF ohBF/KOvyob1XS9B2liOiD00E/DvsIwBwR0TgBlPPyBOcjnQ7C0e/GdUnr+nOdMnGqSf YQ==
Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2y2jx6sk7x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:57:26 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01EEvNcl101811; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:57:25 GMT
Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2y4k9mj9e7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:57:25 +0000
Received: from abhmp0008.oracle.com (abhmp0008.oracle.com [141.146.116.14]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 01EEvOS8008537; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:57:24 GMT
Received: from anon-dhcp-152.1015granger.net (/68.61.232.219) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 06:57:24 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jdeQfOpmU=sC9T1bzwQ0bzARsHnC=KKw21LQcb8KXD-ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:57:23 -0500
Cc: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <66A9E978-0C8C-4047-A61A-628EF4A1C9B8@oracle.com>
References: <CADaq8jc=QosG5T+DRT4m9XjbVm8qMvKdYk5GzZmvFhhdtaVCTg@mail.gmail.com> <47FFE1B7-6DAE-4B33-B4BF-A417A68A020F@oracle.com> <CADaq8jdeQfOpmU=sC9T1bzwQ0bzARsHnC=KKw21LQcb8KXD-ow@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9530 signatures=668685
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=849 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002140118
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9530 signatures=668685
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=910 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002140117
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/nO2PHlXSu-nbUXU2GCdD1tTJ6AA>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] IETF 107 Agendas needed in early March
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:57:30 -0000
> On Feb 14, 2020, at 5:19 AM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020, 4:28 PM Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote: >> Hi Dave- >> >> > On Feb 10, 2020, at 12:17 PM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Mentioning this again: As rpcrdma-version-two is a current WG milestone, is >> there a need to discuss that document and/or draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfs-ulb-v2 >> during the first session? > > Yes there is. Somehow I screwed up and dropped this. Is ten minutes ok? Can you make it 15 minutes? Steal 5 minutes from the integrity measurement presentation. >> Missing from the second session, and perhaps more important than either >> computational storage or document review is a discussion of future RPC >> transports. > > Agree with regard to computational storage but would like to keep the document review discussion. Do you have time to lead that discussion and address future RPC transports issues as well? "that discussion" -- do you mean document review? I sent you private mail last week with my presentation abstracts. If you missed it, I can resend. I can cover "future RPC transports" if no-one else wants to. -- Chuck Lever
- [nfsv4] IETF 107 Agendas needed in early March David Noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] IETF 107 Agendas needed in early March Chuck Lever
- Re: [nfsv4] IETF 107 Agendas needed in early March David Noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] IETF 107 Agendas needed in early March Chuck Lever
- Re: [nfsv4] IETF 107 Agendas needed in early March David Noveck