Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Namespace" Chapter
Thomas Haynes <thomas@netapp.com> Wed, 22 September 2010 23:42 UTC
Return-Path: <Thomas.Haynes@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE04F3A69C9 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QtZJCC2DT0EK for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0B03A69E0 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,220,1283756400"; d="scan'208";a="456328488"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2010 16:43:16 -0700
Received: from sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com (sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.99.115.27]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id o8MNhFDs009133 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtprsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.100.161.114]) by sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:43:16 -0700
Received: from RTPMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([10.100.161.112]) by rtprsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:43:14 -0400
Received: from tony-lins-macbook-pro.local ([10.58.54.77]) by RTPMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:43:14 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Thomas Haynes <thomas@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1009221101060.21841@jlentini-linux.nane.netapp.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:43:12 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <5C402FE4-B508-47F1-91AB-395BE060DA43@netapp.com>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1009221101060.21841@jlentini-linux.nane.netapp.com>
To: James Lentini <jlentini@netapp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2010 23:43:14.0220 (UTC) FILETIME=[EC67E6C0:01CB5AAF]
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Namespace" Chapter
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:42:50 -0000
On Sep 22, 2010, at 6:31 PM, James Lentini wrote: > > > Throughout Chapter 7, I noticed a few minor typos that I remembered > sending corrections for in the run up to RFC 5661. Comparing a diff of > Chapter 11 in RFC 5661 and Chapter 7 in the 3530bis draft leads me to > conclude that the text in 3530bis was not taken from the final version > of RFC 5661. As a results, it looks like some fixes from the WG and > RFC Editor are missing in the 3530bis version. In the diff below, I've > pulled the missing corrections into the 3530bis git repo's XML source > file for Chapter 7. These changes are mostly just punctuation, missing > words, etc. > James, It was taken from the final version available in the xml from the old http://nfsv4-editor.org/ site. I take that to mean that there were edits after draft 25. This was actually one of the original issues I had to face in 3530bis, taking the raw text from 3530 and converting it into xml. And I did it to avoid such issues. Thanks for detecting this and I'll start to apply your changes. Tom
- [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Namespace… James Lentini
- Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Names… Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Names… James Lentini
- Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Names… Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Names… James Lentini
- Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Names… Trond Myklebust
- Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Names… Spencer Shepler
- Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Names… Trond Myklebust
- Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Names… david.noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Names… James Lentini
- Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Names… david.noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] Review of 3530bis "Multi-Server Names… Robert Thurlow