IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07

worley@ariadne.com Tue, 09 June 2020 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3ACC3A0949 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 19:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.639
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcastmailservice.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FJEj85HDjrC0 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 19:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92C8B3A0927 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 19:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-18v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.114]) by resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id iTXcjGDNKKcgOiTkEj7aym; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 02:12:06 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20180828_2048; t=1591668726; bh=M7QtQzDaNwQYdE2Xb9VZ+nz9XktfCtxQ3qCVUWtBWtI=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=Hxac/s9FExHrGj5TGlqiBPd6n2X2+cMSwIWZj9ie7Hz/5tVYIQg0RdIsqS+U0JPCi B5x1NvSdBdqMzmF47VfbzzNkV901ovKl/gxctcC1QIXP10TovouOlWT3LlCeeQRYn+ kaF3m9Qe20dSBmEMYorW2CXvCYPRc/QXpHG/fYsRcRh8m0Ym6snLnoDe0+V2tvkfUc iuEQmwT09oKScAi1O8fSzayuanAqvFYmyYens0ELg4rwrSnrTk8pKKwNZtMwEn/0mP GZVNpAxMmijHHRtWuGwAosHM7qzLHVc1Eh7IdWQAkiLoK2QGOedNhf/EQ6t+I3ER8N J/aMYyDUp/obw==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4a00:430:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by resomta-ch2-18v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id iTkAjWi7yfvIWiTkCjCNPn; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 02:12:05 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=-100.00;st=legit
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 0592C2PR028530; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 22:12:02 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 0592C15j028518; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 22:12:01 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls.all@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <B93475FD-8908-4E5B-A3C3-BAD7A1278659@oracle.com> (chuck.lever@oracle.com)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 22:12:00 -0400
Message-ID: <87eeqp7ztb.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/q2XftYNH_rvOoDyafz6TM71HPqA>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 02:12:12 -0000

Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> writes:
>> On May 29, 2020, at 9:44 PM, worley@ariadne.com wrote:
>> These changes look sufficient to me.
>
> Do you mean only the latest rewrite of Section 4.1, or does the above
> sign-off include the changes proposed in:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/z8wyJEalDv2mdMxkeSyaBa7Q7s0/

Yes, it includes all of the changes resulting from our discussion.

(But it's excessive to say that I "sign off" on them, as I have no
authority.  As the review says, "Please treat these comments just like
any other last call comments.")

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email