[nfsv4] Re: New Version Notification for draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-acls-01.txt

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Fri, 07 June 2024 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30A9C151527 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K3vQHWxKmOKV for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 13:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B57BC151093 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 13:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6b04bacd1e1so13486166d6.0 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 13:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1717792646; x=1718397446; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/+uWhvYDNP0TtaW03LSUrutB5l+PZPoPIzwWTiXXGEo=; b=SMwNkC5+voyU9XdF7XSjM/bVyGuGRarNJtUdcwfjIskoMp6SVE59ZXEFzNsyKqEGKU l7VWOvjf0BTENdcHfpAauzcd3AVd8co7urDxv5+vgh+j6e3iE/riKz9hUscbQsIcnXEX 1z1ha6VEoUM1wIDgWf73O+rYMuv1hgs0WmdcYGDTSdoRMozGdbLIrC7FFGukKfxQMheV 33YaVRqut8tKI4CPZv9Qu71JY4ZGOEJgua4qd+UDsocRS9mENzf56kjt6jToN+T1V21V CeZ8G+L16zJYxEBhKD0tWJNLYoSMPWBYllssONgT+tLc8fgwbbPVTLYOtwPKDSqAsddw kzFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717792646; x=1718397446; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=/+uWhvYDNP0TtaW03LSUrutB5l+PZPoPIzwWTiXXGEo=; b=kRTI2MDG32PFpd1RB78DQw5WTEwVIg1wpyILCbMoelUVNuc9vF9nIb8ZBgn9mner55 NCfUpFgwoN/GDLBQoXLY723rXDsrJDR4yI+0MhXahrv4sbvPckCawqpq2prYl/jfd1oN Dcoyc5IzXiVUnVaMhkWpJhF8wL1SkqL/fPg7P7AHLjtgNLkH3q/zpYlxS+mWU8hhp66D NkqeoROd8tW8YPaR3kVN2qSZc4it6IFbvLZHwbRpZYAQm+skyYbcLZknMYXtvau53Lxb cMugpsBWo+1PyMU6CMphIBmBB6YrDmSzoUcm1kw3hJ2KtbDhA3WvQnk+70SAByDd7dW3 HjQA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXVS1HgjbJDru9GVVclxcPBUO3B9PYiAxMjoebHO495Op541w8Q7pArJCIKsnUznMzdmolbf36CI3lTGCEh3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxiBsg7m4UgOq5bt7zCAlWxm+zk/Rb9Fa97OocSGKwDUoQJopQe fc+X5x3ZM393pXPJDYVnwR+RefC6Z5r1YW2z012HS5OcKMxBLFSehGKKq8LD5Mto7NXOYniMePZ tIY/u0OEMuESuWVubyUdKNgjX5rE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF62F4bHdMXyCNTXDH45+6kMHomVotDWvYXvcTGQs6MR4p30o+zwsTIrt/yFQPYghqEF/Mmh+8/Jp1X9VWQ9Fk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5b82:b0:6b0:253:e849 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6b059f2e6f0mr39790666d6.53.1717792645788; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 13:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <171415518303.3337.11515633260776443720@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADaq8jfNeu9ZAibEBLp=+EtczS69k1rQK1X57mvmbMLGdY8ztg@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5tNy6RndufxNq3+2CYvQYzt2PAoiLyyQiZErMcoSQDwVmm6A@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jdqsJQ5pMQsj0obENvmMqF6oKkiQffHVVcFygMucPMmxg@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5tNy5K64ULERss8tyx0EL10iSrNQiPbpeVWNidhixuLVrzWA@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jdURkr2MDQBBbB74DVEBO9f=B8mdA9vgyc4vX0YAFZ6aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5tNy41WeF3_FYp=oMx0wti7T9nfcRLvNc46CHUb57HivYwgw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5tNy5L4sBTU3cZquo8rDQosPMwVN71QbEQ9g4EM+52Gah-HA@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jeJjWEgmkkvP9Dj1ZnBCOBDPxPB1LfA33w3xgWej7N0vg@mail.gmail.com> <28f03f0cdb7dc26ef1f6b03b7ecd48d46418a398.camel@poochiereds.net> <20240607141609.GA22054@fieldses.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240607141609.GA22054@fieldses.org>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 16:37:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jd54vb9xDfHde31m5WH1YJOccqfu5Mw5LcpYkhKX+a4nQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000733bc7061a52c4eb"
Message-ID-Hash: 7CBQOHF6UMRXHKQUGO6IBM6CPAXC34YH
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7CBQOHF6UMRXHKQUGO6IBM6CPAXC34YH
X-MailFrom: davenoveck@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-nfsv4.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [nfsv4] Re: New Version Notification for draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-acls-01.txt
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/qSZKgiYcZ7tUkfDaAQqZU04UI_I>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:nfsv4-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-leave@ietf.org>

On Fri, Jun 7, 2024, 10:16 AM J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:

> Wow, this document is long.
>
> I probably won't be able to read it.  I do notice on a quick skim that
> it still claims to be fixing problems with "reverse-slope" modes (like
> r--rw-rw-).  Which makes me wonder if Dave has addressed the feedback at
> the end of my previous note:
>
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/UiPOc1ozJaKOeWVP26ycBdI-jIA/


Sorry.  This slipped by me at the time.


>
> My impression at that time was that Dave's proposal would result in
> incorrect handling of reverse-slope modes.
>

Your example included DENY ACEs.   Are you saying there are problems with
my approach that do not involve use of DENY ACEs?


> I'd strongly recommend working through some specific examples there.
>

Fair enough.

>
> --b.
>