IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Thinking about an RFC5661bis.

Tom Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com> Thu, 28 February 2019 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <loghyr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA59130E9F for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:06:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ztMkcNUPVPn0 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC600130EB2 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:06:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id b65so7013727plb.6 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:06:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=j+OMBVtgVmrBZTMxYeHpaTXnJaJoEFV70BGggzDGo2M=; b=M9phRxeNxG7R0Tipo+KPjxctxVr8CbeTJ/Ge0if9+9ECtF1G8IMIGxWmvcCqhWcmJf ro3kfZlg9r29EwklAcqG9pCcBqjzHsjruUqiAXbSeNes0w3dnvs7MKA0T7n6gNOIljVQ CoCroTOks7UP65jNyBuqODr1ypJTQvNrLxzR1HZvdg4RxpNDwE7bz6BFY7N1R78YEaHo 4cYADY5D+TAW+PNkNTc61yFh36MrQZU2rehS+nDnZtdUQldxAVPVNPLWGp833F8f5mA1 epewgePQw8ammGl1DdkP0MBA0LS/ia8g2xOQudnuIsUWqI/juntZzxVUFEf6VPqtiFwT i3wA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=j+OMBVtgVmrBZTMxYeHpaTXnJaJoEFV70BGggzDGo2M=; b=I5BmYamHRiZ30qWmXSlYJqZVMXUQNc30JUUMQPurqAAYoo33gc1mMnFxM6hbQLit+A MvKwfBf92k/RfctKiQUoypTUx0GvETvy49L/LGjR8de17BwsbexGUpLbnfo5tcuBnM0+ rHOYWzrs83PggQ7Nb84VyaMIb6FokDdUsjk5Cu1tv639XKU5lqzg2NYb6+weSYjIDwnE EKaw3yg/SO2hSqWarWAufqy3LCzvY27y/9JhY4ALOVYwaa8QaY5JpvWTFU4boWQJMbvv woYDKyEcLAy0tZPQXeCBDkjmkCrl6yveCI+7JWenidWBskmd6CriqoUE1cQ8Y3ed6E5d cOqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWm8pk4YJsgr7nLwwOTRmbxZnFPs6UJw8QqZxwnh6893bHEEKGe AGNFZwghSVrSoqwyQ2CViZn6L0US
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwjDPI9DfhKfpa3QYCrA2CNuO8ao+wMERUmJAlKq8JYF0MKbykIcqgUlOiZ89aeJtDFdmcAkg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:112c:: with SMTP id d41mr351266pla.177.1551373593068; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:06:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.38] (c-69-181-67-218.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [69.181.67.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p78sm30341089pfa.84.2019.02.28.09.06.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:06:32 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Tom Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16D57)
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8je5pzF7m+4oVCNfSeeBDQ98kBwAdCN_o1hBrfDob=SBaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:06:31 -0800
Cc: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <435DA055-E09A-4E0E-8E5D-49D5554DDAAC@gmail.com>
References: <CADaq8je5pzF7m+4oVCNfSeeBDQ98kBwAdCN_o1hBrfDob=SBaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/r4rDbJ43taUzNdug35L5ggVe994>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Thinking about an RFC5661bis.
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:06:35 -0000

While not volunteering, I do have a git repository for this work already started - last entry was 4-5 years ago. 

I believe it also had some of the errata applied.

And again, the reason why we never started is because it is a lot of work - both to edit and review.

Hadn’t we discussed breaking it down into more manageable chunks? Many smaller documents (like we did for versioning) and then one which stitched them together?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email