IETF Logo Mail Archive

[nfsv4] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8881 (7386)

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Fri, 06 September 2024 08:07 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022E2C14CF12 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 01:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O9gKMlyIoFCp for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 01:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb29.google.com (mail-yb1-xb29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D2EFC14F615 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 01:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb29.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e0b7efa1c1bso1861324276.3 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 01:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725610073; x=1726214873; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=X09sF38QnMc8E9qFIGuohSz+0hRwcNdRfRYsGQNon/c=; b=NbBW+rlxBnLTDL5X0gL83mKPEKJ7Hs1F8UVzGrGPU9SBm6Y2HZVaj2ISzpatVD7BI0 m+GQp1wyrWQzV4gkyegPYmwdISLO5ixZweuZ52DzTkbwEc4QSydV/WWfyyezdrPX6kE2 jknHAC02ehPpsytRnU/RWEvJZB0a/3x6zirGWLKXgGNneFqD9V8N+hU4BTAqZbU8KhaD G+Mm2wWDopKi8Y/l1N2sCuR+a9ivY4DEUFawMPRqbeHeHh7VMaQdB5bgcqwJf4Z9IqdY lyN389p4RujwGfievZVWEKjzs3tlSQCyhee3P2QO7EvAmy5t60LPb7VBfu+fv1s5kf3w DFZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725610073; x=1726214873; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=X09sF38QnMc8E9qFIGuohSz+0hRwcNdRfRYsGQNon/c=; b=M15sNb9PM7+9MVlZG4/lAdstkbpK4ip5pgL+kTS5rhiWLLq3ZgEo64fWx0v0gCBtXQ 42DWizwGMx2jT2jkHt7KmUl0/+ukV0o2Vo9IbXsqmhLhsmoP0RgMWuZsdEflIuhZrWB5 d5x4BDzlXveAfEXpoIW+S7CHdjXqtjRrf/KxyCeQzYLmzBmr6mm1XIXgcIn7yzASufpI MdLQ+M+glNdKuEr1Ahzpbqjoe4VytSs8TzEs2Zgiir8JXxhGudv73MujDdVUwiv+hMTN Nrl4Nt94fBspG/Rr1OVxZ2L75g2Gd6lQaRUatJM8NuY5sZXHzbrdJxg3D0lUiQ6tngRv J0DQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVcxskkLcRby+O1+6zNQh1yktH27YSECltc3SNKKa9+kLMtVNX8zlQ1IcouJonxstnB9nu0OA==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxcXX6frvEnSyKVTmXVebbpYIg0ntDZVl4tjNM/xaun65VozoCd woqhJXmkIterRIGa8yRuEWMbD6udj0LPM4xe0xoHjSrA4wqIGUI6zUbgVmp+XXTYe6W6M3HJemx ExmE2jqjnOjvCPkwrV1Yrb/Rn4uA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEqpmwzHQ46AP4K+HlDrx8P+UiVpdCv9088679RhNSG4Moi7tV/33UaQuxhrvXTD4Q1x9NKprK39LGf3t260lI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:228e:b0:e1d:2098:8511 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e1d34869af6mr1866393276.10.1725610073373; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 01:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230313145150.17E364C922@rfcpa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230313145150.17E364C922@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 04:07:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jcGiuAEu65X6=y85ss2tT=hPe_F5d+=cLT4RGUxPjbWJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000071c90806216ee773"
Message-ID-Hash: ODPJPGOBPWSK6HFVK3EYRL4IFBAVL2ER
X-Message-ID-Hash: ODPJPGOBPWSK6HFVK3EYRL4IFBAVL2ER
X-MailFrom: davenoveck@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-nfsv4.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Dave Noveck <dnoveck@netapp.com>, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>, rfc@pali.im, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [nfsv4] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8881 (7386)
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/rSWrArIReMNQG7nEPka0qxHDCnQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:nfsv4-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-leave@ietf.org>

Should be verified.  Will address in next draft of
draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661bis.

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023, 10:51 AM RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8881,
> "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7386
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Pali Rohár <rfc@pali.im>
>
> Section: 18.46.3.
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>                                                              Operations
>    other than SEQUENCE, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION, EXCHANGE_ID,
>    CREATE_SESSION, and DESTROY_SESSION, MUST NOT appear as the first
>    operation in a COMPOUND.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>                                                              Operations
>    other than SEQUENCE, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION, EXCHANGE_ID,
>    CREATE_SESSION, DESTROY_SESSION, and DESTROY_CLIENTID, MUST NOT
>    appear as the first operation in a COMPOUND.
>
> Notes
> -----
> Section 18.50.3. DESCRIPTION of DESTROY_CLIENTID says
>
> "DESTROY_CLIENTID MAY be preceded with a SEQUENCE"
>
> and also says
>
> "If DESTROY_CLIENTID is not prefixed by SEQUENCE, it MUST be the only
> operation in the COMPOUND request"
>
> which implies that DESTROY_CLIENTID can appear as the first (and the only)
> operation in a COMPOUND.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8881 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1
> Protocol
> Publication Date    : August 2020
> Author(s)           : D. Noveck, Ed., C. Lever
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network File System Version 4
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status