IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Verified editorial Errata on 5561 and sesqui-msns

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0833E3A0B81 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j8KtFn5PNH39 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A05073A0B7E for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id m20so10881429eds.2 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bSUMT3oMSuXaWmsmR1dYUUSQrduqcJw8syuGgwzd4eY=; b=kRzl2iVv7uMS/8/G+Jh53zt5Ei1M2synMiKkdHkdxzrEHBL9IW4z4oJs+eZ7t/b1Bb 3RplFEIdYhFvtIU+WIrgJCzQ3WKI9oK5DziWKxjeiURP0Dz6QShYGYP3DkWO/zD+hKf5 eiP6ebPC061EtNEdcEZup7A5kpg0lVhhb5pK4FsoTuUQtyLGxFc0+s0RE0+SzS/3jWPP Mkfox6nAcp+jI7imAdrffMc15A1Kcdps1cZkltTp5fGO+bxgtMh1qDGcekRR4Y9e824u e1ynXuIMKi4/7NQ7Yila13EV8zbZo3uEXccPnxgGa6ZnplCYQMtfOhkyZ3Bf4cnOe7en wo2A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bSUMT3oMSuXaWmsmR1dYUUSQrduqcJw8syuGgwzd4eY=; b=KkD1Llt+lg7reIHwmpwzHPHVJblsR637iLFu0jJn4TebtmrtSIQCUetcHWDtCWfPI6 lcarlxljSbprqn3BIDlnkRwFAdQoYww+Ju8hSOJnbfqpQ/IZ2ejqybWLvtK+fgI/tPb9 zpSyYvEm/Cq9t8Lp3MbaLr9kbQzrCp7wq4Ogt+L/nNO4Bbq597mz0d8NhTHs6Qm2KSX4 yndEpcdtU0rPcTkSbF774hA6Z47eTQb1iUlhRKE4niiCtwTbjCFTxNXcdQ3UGZ3q159j ozgvR+1n2JTy73Qm8sjWBfNPHwUS7CYIaaIxUiq1cE88zPeB6vP/6oT7Y4vya6OUeM4V 8vJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+wcU8e6MTNzv23nGConL2WJCQL4h+VRRzU/2wWzlVA3GwmY8I xXsjaXPcROgpBcVcrsK2KjaGlscuWCOkdKOCAENBHg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYYddC6bwK1CnwXiCMF4aC7sX/WxJVX6rm3aGXjYmq6149yXZqBvWUII2axv99CcZBvtz3+avouI/+YmE7Azk=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c54e:: with SMTP id s14mr3431593edr.81.1596125776056; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <HE1PR0702MB3772011E83C71FC05A28983F95700@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <65F221A3-3405-4F2C-99B6-278E8C2C0AD8@oracle.com> <HE1PR0702MB377297EAEE9040F8BDD7046D95710@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <8c6e035a-9b50-f485-794a-54f02619643c@talpey.com> <0D94413C-0FB3-443C-AB5A-8CDBAE6766F7@oracle.com> <HE1PR0702MB37722A819EA66409C9DB20AE95710@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <3132b952-08ec-10bc-aa0b-a365d79966df@talpey.com>
In-Reply-To: <3132b952-08ec-10bc-aa0b-a365d79966df@talpey.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:16:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jfs33yUyjap3=Ock+-9EdQg_itcfJh=jU5voYMETKwMhw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e615ea05abaafd8f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/tYYMnWPeZ85JNrbBIoCxsognJzc>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Verified editorial Errata on 5561 and sesqui-msns
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:16:19 -0000

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020, 12:11 PM Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com> wrote:

> On 7/30/2020 11:08 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:> ...
> > So from my perspective the safe path here is to leave 2249 out.
>
> I don't disagree, but one question. Because this is an accepted
> erratum, what is the procedure for marking the text as such in
> the new document? Do we simply transfer the erratum to the update


It  has been my understanding that this would be done by the rfc editor

and the new landing page says "Errata Exist" ab initio?
>

I guess so.


> Tom.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email