Return-Path: <chucklever@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199701202FC
 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  5 Aug 2019 12:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id LCs24sly_ynm for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Mon,  5 Aug 2019 12:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4DC412036A
 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon,  5 Aug 2019 12:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id w196so41521529oie.7
 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; 
 h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
 bh=9EhGyMLD5CWsLWGQIW4crxpiZpg4dVubUaOCFTSnz7Y=;
 b=F+74f8lzucZGpQR4oH34BuAnQ+hvSFREne4fFCHu3pZHkGM4fRGZJx1SVHlD2j0iTb
 uqnJc4/UCc/X7eY+zNuGJBXnSeRhxzDnchcrV4qVFBUm4cZU47mfqbQXMLFBNwtqOq4v
 2BvzJOzFRIo/JqImp5lAJscbg4w4RFQzqEV5pEAFEzNTESDYJfNnlomKe04un4b9Bi1y
 kLEBNdMVK5UyonIoLP/q9bhalkebt9/84vefW1aA3JgBUz1u1oWr52raPFCaZNLxS+yE
 ulLtOeUk/m2KPdm4OxV/nAEm2cdRdZ9zc66c9QQXD56gmjwNbNvhIS2uQDe4EyPBHsYO
 er3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
 bh=9EhGyMLD5CWsLWGQIW4crxpiZpg4dVubUaOCFTSnz7Y=;
 b=XPDp3tV7LtScEHKU+pfQf2v/zlVyTd/hBfAAr6BDWWEx5hOrQUMbBpppVP8E6XF+EF
 3y2eHZciKtlIruwZln6AuA4RYAWpxqjnqnlxCOOklqfvLvGpNkSs7BoBZ2xsRIJgRid5
 I6zCzSyL2LNgd0ClxYleqpIEUMhQbalUjQ02NVhq/sF4Ztx4rwx809+gYiAFKhk03i6c
 RfYVJ69JA0IkW3LSxgZHDHJ6cb85vVP1VcdTNzl/Y5R4XF9wEMhdJ7l8ThSddESKqWtd
 +jW7+Xr13lhO0+BxCJiBVACasRn1KdmJcAYwPImZ8aVJJTWBv7AU7AxMAztbLuMnH02Y
 Rgeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX49ohmNXEJNkcZqCM7ljxNOgfTJwhxEasia73rVrahN1xWpFqz
 vamVCJvkor2s5Yfv8xmpkzk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw+ypvKprRrc+mS46i/f345kMVc+1zbgE+Ya9+OZ5P3l1bQYKImsnCb6x84pvUvBuFLLO9n4Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a02:c80d:: with SMTP id p13mr71387822jao.59.1565031637237; 
 Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from anon-dhcp-153.1015granger.net
 (c-68-61-232-219.hsd1.mi.comcast.net. [68.61.232.219])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n2sm87686213ioa.27.2019.08.05.12.00.36
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chuck Lever <chucklever@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bd89b224fd62405ab2c6524c3ca18304@x13pwdurdag1001.AMER.DELL.COM>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 15:00:35 -0400
Cc: Matt Benjamin <mbenjami@redhat.com>, Philip.Shilane@dell.com,
 victor.asencio@upr.edu, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F908CB03-A95C-4C02-A719-223F792D9C29@gmail.com>
References: <CADowLe+VaR15Bw49oNrZWtYLNcG6__kG2oD+yiOS07ON9mKTuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ecac6b1e73df449ea3b86f16c251aaa6@x13pwdurdag1001.AMER.DELL.COM>
 <CADaq8jeSmX1CyRK4ihuJ5eTcoAwdbm8CWO2_jBHNpkcDjx8sQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKOnarkoyCERM0AHsfamO509=UwsrpsGYXjoQvxWD0ePuk7CKw@mail.gmail.com>
 <D72E64BF-6F92-40F0-9A53-6A9C50413B1C@gmail.com>
 <bd89b224fd62405ab2c6524c3ca18304@x13pwdurdag1001.AMER.DELL.COM>
To: "faibish, sorin" <Faibish.Sorin@dell.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/tl6C8oiDYX4s_TK9l3mqBD-s-WE>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Extended Attributes NFSv4
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>,
 <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>,
 <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 19:00:51 -0000

Thanks, Sorin.

> On Aug 5, 2019, at 2:06 PM, Faibish.Sorin@dell.com wrote:
>=20
> Chuck,
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Lever <chucklever@gmail.com>=20
> Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 2:16 PM
> To: Matt Benjamin; faibish, sorin
> Cc: David Noveck; Shilane, Philip; victor.asencio@upr.edu; NFSv4
> Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Extended Attributes NFSv4
>=20
>=20
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]=20
>=20
> Hi Matt-
>=20
> I don't recall us rejecting RFC 8276 in general. My sense of the room =
was we were not sensing good alignment between user extended attributes =
as specified in RFC 8276 and their use for conveying data reduction =
metadata, as proposed in
>=20
> =
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-faibish-data-reduction-xattrs-pvt/ =
.
>=20
> By the way, Sorin, you should rename this document, when you submit =
the next revision, to include "nfsv4" in the name so it appears on the =
NFSv4 WG page where it is easy to find. Something like
>=20
> draft-faibish-nfsv4-data-reduction-attributes
> [sf] I followed your recommendation and changed the name of my draft. =
I posted the revise draft.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> would work.
>=20
>=20
>> On Aug 2, 2019, at 12:43 PM, Matt Benjamin <mbenjami@redhat.com> =
wrote:
>>=20
>> I was not aware that this had been rejected?
>>=20
>> Matt
>>=20
>> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:42 PM David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> The NFSv4 WG rejected the idea of using extended attributes that =
were specified in the rfc 8276.
>>>=20
>>> I don't'  think the working group considered and rejected the idea =
using extended attributes,   Making a decision like that is way to =
organized for an IETF working group, espec.
>>>=20
>>> Tha
>>>> It seems nobody implemented xattr per the rfc. If you have any =
plans=20
>>>> for that please let the NFSv4 WG know sending this email to the=20
>>>> nfsv4 list I added here. Thanks
>>>=20
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:47 AM <Faibish.Sorin@dell.com> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>> Victor,
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Just to keep you expectations low, the NFSv4 WG rejected the idea =
of=20
>>>> using extended attributes that were specified in the rfc 8276. It=20=

>>>> seems nobody implemented xattr per the rfc. If you have any plans=20=

>>>> for that please let the NFSv4 WG know sending this email to the=20
>>>> nfsv4 list I added here. Thanks
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> ./Sorin
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> From: Victor A Asencio Casiano <victor.asencio@upr.edu>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 10:43 AM
>>>> To: faibish, sorin; Shilane, Philip; Black, David
>>>> Cc: manoj.naik@nutanix.com; eshel@us.ibm.com
>>>> Subject: Extended Attributes NFSv4
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>>>>=20
>>>> Good morning, I=E2=80=99m currently interested in adding extended =
attributes to NFSv4 and I would like if you can send me in the right =
direction. RFC 8276 and your draft (Support for Data Reduction Extended =
Attributes in nfsv4 Version 2) are the only serious documents that I =
found about this topic. I would like to know if Extended Attributes have =
been already implemented somewhere that I can test it out, or If someone =
try to implement this before or any source code that I can reach out or =
any draft code? Besides the code portions that appears on RFC 8276.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Thanks for your help.
>>>>=20
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nfsv4 mailing list
>>>> nfsv4@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>>>=20
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nfsv4 mailing list
>>> nfsv4@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> --
>>=20
>> Matt Benjamin
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
>> Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103
>>=20
>> http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage
>>=20
>> tel.  734-821-5101
>> fax.  734-769-8938
>> cel.  734-216-5309
>>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfsv4 mailing list
>> nfsv4@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>=20
> --
> Chuck Lever
> chucklever@gmail.com
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

--
Chuck Lever
chucklever@gmail.com



