[nfsv4] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-08: (with COMMENT)
"Kathleen Moriarty" <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 29 August 2016 18:57 UTC
Return-Path: <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBC412D08C; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.31.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147249703400.18985.17785625452584051064.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:57:14 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/ugLsKZvnLHGpfu5hFkZV_zn3lZk>
Cc: nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout@ietf.org
Subject: [nfsv4] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:57:14 -0000
Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For the security considerations, it would be good to include a few examples of the security provided by iSCSI, like encryption via IPsec (tunnel and transport mode - IMO opinion this RFC makes it difficult to set this up in an interoperable way, but that's not the responsibility of this draft), authentication, etc. RFC7143 is such a large document, just a pointer isn't as helpful here in comparison to the no security example. This is just at the comment level since the pointer is technically sufficient, but sets one up for a lot of reading.
- [nfsv4] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [nfsv4] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on d… Christoph Hellwig