Re: [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on renewing sequence IDs
"Spencer Shepler" <spencer.shepler@gmail.com> Sat, 20 November 2010 05:41 UTC
Return-Path: <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CAF83A6887 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:41:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YkVOLZi-Z7uU for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:41:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B217928C118 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:41:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gwj23 with SMTP id 23so259799gwj.31 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:41:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=UFlXSdzx+Kc2VW4YHN2ac0iT/pHkJzySoHIkXBrEyZ0=; b=GMfX/LQMmn1SL5PZggdjGqxdJ+yO3F6cLWCSo2mkr2GtwB3c0Rl4m4Q5MvgUtlOkq7 7az6EHAONKNbDY/XfRNx1x5uRjcBkyUBDKbQTuZtqH/pw9k8LLfQjAM43J5pckg2gAeb 2fWHLjK3gHLf8ZBUXwk94P5l4NqDIHZvBay4o=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; b=c9hOKs4MKpQSO2M2YGl3ZcgkYxp92Qz40qt47g9p1bvGjUbKU3nFmF/vBDs8+H8i4v TgpNNKZ+CTeebv+43mQc8I9gv8eZFm7bVKmBe5pQ8w9iKIdB9FNpGHeWjVBDJeRFzMQU 1aa2RW2QOVAxsLEv4ewQA3B3Hwd1yXEdkHDPU=
Received: by 10.151.101.3 with SMTP id d3mr4928653ybm.200.1290231686485; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:41:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ssheplermobile (m1e0436d0.tmodns.net [208.54.4.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j44sm1022345yha.25.2010.11.19.21.41.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:41:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Spencer Shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
To: "'Haynes, Tom'" <Thomas.Haynes@netapp.com>
References: <4CACD9BF.2010809@oracle.com> <4CD32C31.3040909@oracle.com> <1288965554.3975.27.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <BF3BB6D12298F54B89C8DCC1E4073D8002945154@CORPUSMX50A.corp.emc.com> <1290100143.7245.9.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <BF3BB6D12298F54B89C8DCC1E4073D8002A5EE45@CORPUSMX50A.corp.emc.com> <1290207533.3135.80.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <B038A121-D2A2-4FAE-B499-309125BBE4C9@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <B038A121-D2A2-4FAE-B499-309125BBE4C9@netapp.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:41:19 -0800
Message-ID: <03d401cb8875$91577450$b4065cf0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQE2LbAIBBxN4N6c6gd8+ZtAEIptBwIbWQTAAf4xWTIDJtBqVwIUlghrAkwTBrMCH+NvlwJFejJ9lCRcOnA=
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on renewing sequence IDs
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 05:41:54 -0000
While publishing additions to the WG alias in xml is fine with me, please ensure that it is somewhat readable. Also, take care not to use github as the publishing mechanism. I-Ds are the place to capture reasonable interim versions of the I-D. Spencer > -----Original Message----- > From: nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Haynes, Tom > Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 5:49 PM > To: Trond Myklebust > Cc: Robert.Thurlow@oracle.com; nfsv4@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on renewing sequence > IDs > > Yeah, I was planning on starting it anyway. I'll get it done by Monday. > > And github works great for me. > > On Nov 19, 2010, at 2:58 PM, "Trond Myklebust" > <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:39 -0500, david.noveck@emc.com wrote: > >> I think we will need to have a v4.2 document minor version document > >> in place soon. This kind of small thing (bug or not) is just not big > >> enough to merit an internet-draft. If you require it, these things > >> will just not get done. I think that once we have a framework for > >> this sort of small addition, we can publish the text for the new op > >> or callback in messages on the working group list and then > >> incorporate them in the next > >> v4.2 draft, once there is rough consensus. My suggestion is that we > >> make it the practice to publish proposed v4.2 text in the form of > >> xml2rfc xml within the working group email to make it simpler for the > >> v4.2 document editor to incorporate. > > > > Tom, now is your chance to shine even brighter! Another git repository > > to complement git://github.com/loghyr/3530bis.git and a 4.2 review > > process incorporating Dave's suggestions? > > > > Cheers > > Trond > > > > -- > > Trond Myklebust > > Linux NFS client maintainer > > > > NetApp > > Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com > > www.netapp.com > > > _______________________________________________ > nfsv4 mailing list > nfsv4@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
- [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on renewi… Robert Thurlow
- Re: [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on re… Robert Thurlow
- Re: [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on re… Trond Myklebust
- Re: [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on re… david.noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on re… Trond Myklebust
- Re: [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on re… david.noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on re… Trond Myklebust
- Re: [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on re… Haynes, Tom
- Re: [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on re… Spencer Shepler
- Re: [nfsv4] 3530bis Issue 39: Clarification on re… Thomas Haynes