[nfsv4] AD review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-layrec
Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 13 August 2024 09:45 UTC
Return-Path: <zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFBBC151087 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 02:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PMZC_CUwvTgV for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 02:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96E36C14F5E7 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 02:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2cd2f89825fso3454457a91.1 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 02:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1723542312; x=1724147112; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RibRp3mT3SBvc1LXEzF3dObGGfUSk+IEtnlsNz5PSHM=; b=C4Sg9PlW7oHrYaJs7UUD4pAlYdCJEYOSTlIv9CyRLhvbZu8cEhG7uJtGPlE2UMzyuy uG6B63JDy6HRLRo8FnOk2BlcxWicZu2LMVXETUo19Use/CIC7mTPaH9ZwWzd/C4DsApf lq3wODXsphHsBQ1lnoC3T6rTYyQYdXT/JYInQYBueIp/97RRdyP/84+lXjsSjKgdxiTK okMLsq744SFCwAPvWfKekswC6Lwnxd1RKUQJWZkfNbaMAo3ZzN+ORPj+7/6nk+DDoMVX 0gauM9hTskMR8umeFp0DvUFdM2gB0yiCSshh6cGwHtI4ZDbbS8XCqv4XEvP13WXUHG58 lJ5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723542312; x=1724147112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RibRp3mT3SBvc1LXEzF3dObGGfUSk+IEtnlsNz5PSHM=; b=puQvjDf3B6aZU259OYaVkbrOgJZb7mCD40/owzZbMQvluSf61Xi3e7GfwyRIxf5cGg x2UYJR6Jxhi3VP356PueH0AUyRTx2t4mrK+EcQXpvmxpK8pdL9cVyBD1gN0mxj9eVf2C BACX61OATg3aWVsbmdvZOjommJ4BvzuU/D+uBluYXqqhQ8AwCB5GxiSwcBmJoV5AwZVo wI9/08dKrAIxLnO92i0qSMQaSvjjStULCO24TxNRRXQbZPC9X2ijUx61apokZkt5REZ/ debelQ3wDkb7qsFC2SuQzy/XL6sGEVFIJ2e6EcTx6W+0LwvK4um5hQwoH81+IBngy3N9 VSmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyEu0izWCe1/cWjmlA5tM1ziWInZzpS2XbBDx1S7l7XU4b9ObLe 11+8zNgyEf1ib7RgGhSlxFOjNE4Nww0FZ5E3DbTl5KcSgpdxqJP2Hd/nAde5vE9+ieBEzxSOyFq gHDJfOY8cA6NAlP/P28pHCk9HBDWu+Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF2qzYBYL+/nIf4J3uT6q0KPLZj7tEVldo7IryWaVJ83nze8OdnWy8Y3mDAN3MC04fk0HhSzSz/M4imBBz4Oio=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4f8b:b0:2d1:ca16:554d with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d3924e16c4mr3345319a91.4.1723542311887; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 02:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:45:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEh=tce845LtxkTBkeb1Lg28RncTE15La2hJ+ggtRjF40tr9QA@mail.gmail.com>
To: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000416d6e061f8d772f"
Message-ID-Hash: IVX5I36IPMJGKW5CCVHEFZOYCM6ZS7YY
X-Message-ID-Hash: IVX5I36IPMJGKW5CCVHEFZOYCM6ZS7YY
X-MailFrom: zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-nfsv4.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [nfsv4] AD review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-layrec
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/vWAaa3g8fyK759sr-u4lDL85Fas>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:nfsv4-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-leave@ietf.org>
Hi, I think this draft is easy to understand and does it's job well. I have decided to send it to IETF Last Call directly. I have two comments , those you can address as part of IETF Last Call review - 1. Define "resilvering" : Even if I know what it means in this context, I think it would be better if we just describe what it means technically for NSFv4 metaservers. 2. The security consideration section is kind of getting nestedly referenced and kind of losing its purpose as the implementers has to go to number of RFCs to find what it means for this context and extension. Hence, I would suggest that we include a very brief description of the security aspects of such extention like this and point to particular sections in the RFCs to find the relevence. For example, we could point to section 4.9 of RFC 7862 if that is relevent for this extention or some thing else. //Zahed
- [nfsv4] AD review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-layrec Zaheduzzaman Sarker