Re: [nfsv4] Potential charter update - removal of "use of NVMe in accessing a pNFS SCSI Layout" work item

"Benjamin Coddington" <bcodding@redhat.com> Mon, 20 May 2019 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <bcodding@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9943912008B for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2019 09:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cA5WxZCPlKPe for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2019 09:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFFC81201CB for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2019 09:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 849D97E421; Mon, 20 May 2019 16:01:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.10.66.2] (ovpn-66-2.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.66.2]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 049831001E73; Mon, 20 May 2019 16:01:03 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Benjamin Coddington" <bcodding@redhat.com>
To: "Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: "spencer shepler" <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 12:01:02 -0400
Message-ID: <37FC4CCF-97DC-4DFF-8497-D3597D88CF91@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <64D9C067-BFF8-4896-AF39-46416BB523F0@oracle.com>
References: <CAFt6Ba=t6dPX2kky-1h+dFo7zr75AqpsDF0ypoMzunKM8RMkQA@mail.gmail.com> <0604B063-3A9B-4B6E-BAF2-53568D4C5CC1@oracle.com> <CAFt6BakJOOOCjxFH9NMdhWqQWSiV7FayLcp8JMOOB97_=JkF_A@mail.gmail.com> <64D9C067-BFF8-4896-AF39-46416BB523F0@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Mon, 20 May 2019 16:01:04 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/w2bVhoTMbULTR1_1PrafOvPdznI>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Potential charter update - removal of "use of NVMe in accessing a pNFS SCSI Layout" work item
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 16:01:27 -0000

On 20 May 2019, at 11:54, Chuck Lever wrote:

>> On May 20, 2019, at 11:46 AM, spencer shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I would prefer that we discuss and close on as many of the outstanding
>> discussions via the alias - prior to the face to face meeting.
>
> My understanding is that the author intends to revive the document when he
> has the resources to complete it. There has been no movement here recently
> and the author has allowed the document to expire.
>
> However we have discussed the topic at every IETF meeting for the past few
> years because there is still plenty of interest in seeing it completed. We
> agreed to leave the item on the charter as a placeholder.
>
> Perhaps it is a topic that is not appropriate as a milestone. Somehow we
> should document the WG's continued interest in this area. Any suggestions?

I'm interested in picking up work on NVMe access for pNFS SCSI Layouts.

What would be the practical result of removing this work item from the
milestone list?

Ben