Re: [nfsv4] Extended Attributes NFSv4

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Fri, 02 August 2019 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D6412071F; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zcV-BaWPt9FI; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32b.google.com (mail-ot1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB70A120742; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id n5so78893083otk.1; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=epHaU4MjadO6GS10ylMlbn98K4k1ep0V/0Taaq9UHro=; b=Fhkk3bjltvdfEsiEaR5LxEmZzlyaYwjP/XVJ+BdCPcjcPrEVUBxJY79liOGQQgelrY 1wzEoeFgPujKLN4gzNCbU9dmRTYbfhQJS8iPzGbAWM+TiO9ErFzCFRJgfggtCuMc6ttx 4MOICyy80gDx1dFIw41T0jIxV8x9RymaFL4P9Qc6c4mSnnm4AltTH16QLYWz6cOToczS YIRAjLocUEJ5ntRlRGBF3WzSf+4OBI4zz7lsVHSgqFBqkTZaEI1RbI5JZHT9SqUJ//qq mmsWMl0nIRNQMNRJIFPOyiZ2rbJ9mio+896RH64cpUZwTEEMGjEF3/OGJSuQpu+ZoWHs O4Lg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=epHaU4MjadO6GS10ylMlbn98K4k1ep0V/0Taaq9UHro=; b=jHyODm1zNXesj/tC7gWhUlsW43PyWbN2rcmfYGjkHHzg4H3m4HQR3z3RmJt0hh1IRQ dxao/IvycGufoPvDIFjpAQ6anLC75mFMOt8CEPeWy4R7+QHflJB/XZw/4OXQ+zJX6Iuk bCgIU4fHAdp02o5EHGJovyUR0+J0OARhNt0yXfctcyuHMv+KvhWirxWCGb6KKJqhyQgw 6TFPxh3F06zRrJaHgCr5HZMe5ZMaWMqV+sWf00T8RbrUNfx+h3bZdpl3JiBdgZDM8dIg YvpqCJmzNMjnjTATx8nkY+Aaom+BFJ55nP4UhLUTV2zgvs003/P6wMUU62lJ9dr6Ii4t VatQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU5o0fG3uznZGykEW/NFQS/ephu7w8YIrwzJmwv2oTUZt5Hw+RW 7huyIH2LUea08LHLaVij7oU+YvgO4A28JPqFxbY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy26FiWZRhn05Dk0gZ7WMFiyVf9+04dA+ERik74ZD7bo/xBVpCovNkuYUpIMdyGLsyTm2TQscqeKHeT6Rty0eI=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6a92:: with SMTP id l18mr7997917otq.294.1564765261239; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADowLe+VaR15Bw49oNrZWtYLNcG6__kG2oD+yiOS07ON9mKTuQ@mail.gmail.com> <ecac6b1e73df449ea3b86f16c251aaa6@x13pwdurdag1001.AMER.DELL.COM> <CADaq8jeSmX1CyRK4ihuJ5eTcoAwdbm8CWO2_jBHNpkcDjx8sQQ@mail.gmail.com> <OF8E7F2E21.87C4851F-ON8825844A.005C46BF-8825844A.005C70BE@notes.na.collabserv.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF8E7F2E21.87C4851F-ON8825844A.005C46BF-8825844A.005C70BE@notes.na.collabserv.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 13:00:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jd4hY77gvv_QHzVg-7CHJbPs4fXfV5WgJ7DXF8Ux1-uoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marc Eshel <eshel@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "faibish, sorin" <Faibish.Sorin@dell.com>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>, nfsv4 <nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org>, Philip.Shilane@dell.com, victor.asencio@upr.edu
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008d9b2f058f254d0c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/wAVnKEK1rtyLze8HaCKJaG2SWvU>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Extended Attributes NFSv4
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 17:01:10 -0000

Cool!

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:49 PM Marc Eshel <eshel@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> There is an implementation in NFS Ganesha for the server side, and a
> prototype for the NFS Linux client side.
> Marc.
>
>
>
> From:   David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
> To:     "faibish, sorin" <Faibish.Sorin@dell.com>
> Cc:     Philip.Shilane@dell.com, victor.asencio@upr.edu, NFSv4
> <nfsv4@ietf.org>
> Date:   08/02/2019 09:42 AM
> Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [nfsv4] Extended Attributes NFSv4
> Sent by:        "nfsv4" <nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org>
>
>
>
> > The NFSv4 WG rejected the idea of using extended attributes that were
> specified in the rfc 8276.
>
> I don't'  think the working group considered and rejected the idea using
> extended attributes,   Making a decision like that is way to organized for
> an IETF working group, espec.
>
> Tha
> > It seems nobody implemented xattr per the rfc. If you have any plans for
> that please let the NFSv4 WG know sending this email to the nfsv4 list I
> added here. Thanks
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:47 AM <Faibish.Sorin@dell.com> wrote:
> Victor,
>
> Just to keep you expectations low, the NFSv4 WG rejected the idea of using
> extended attributes that were specified in the rfc 8276. It seems nobody
> implemented xattr per the rfc. If you have any plans for that please let
> the NFSv4 WG know sending this email to the nfsv4 list I added here.
> Thanks
>
> ./Sorin
>
>
> From: Victor A Asencio Casiano <victor.asencio@upr.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 10:43 AM
> To: faibish, sorin; Shilane, Philip; Black, David
> Cc: manoj.naik@nutanix.com; eshel@us.ibm.com
> Subject: Extended Attributes NFSv4
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> Good morning, I’m currently interested in adding extended attributes to
> NFSv4 and I would like if you can send me in the right direction. RFC 8276
> and your draft (Support for Data Reduction Extended Attributes in nfsv4
> Version 2) are the only serious documents that I found about this topic. I
> would like to know if Extended Attributes have been already implemented
> somewhere that I can test it out, or If someone try to implement this
> before or any source code that I can reach out or any draft code? Besides
> the code portions that appears on RFC 8276.
>
> Thanks for your help.
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_nfsv4&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=NhjWjQMiZ2Z3jl9k1z_vFQ&m=ciCsJOkQAIJqC9dtwkItM5iA0MolxyyZs-81_AsYLOo&s=XgAi3TaMnwCf6mDBCts78JCVpt4A0AeDkaNQpFg-nUo&e=
>
>
>
>
>
>