[nfsv4] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-40: (with COMMENT)

"Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 20 January 2016 16:00 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160120160004.2032.63413.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 08:00:04 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/yk4mgoeT5fxKgmFGgPUqVfjDX1o>
Cc: draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x@ietf.org, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: [nfsv4] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-40: (with COMMENT)

Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-40: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am in the same boat as Ben WRT reviewing XDR code. Given the
description in the shepherd report, I trust the WG and AD have done the
right thing.

[nfsv4] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ie… Brian Haberman