Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89

"Songhaibin (A)" <haibin.song@huawei.com> Fri, 21 February 2014 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <haibin.song@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105DC1A016A for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:39:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NPCLqjaxF3j0 for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:39:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00291A01CD for <nfvcon@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:39:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BDU58951; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:39:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:39:26 +0000
Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:39:41 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.56]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:39:36 +0800
From: "Songhaibin (A)" <haibin.song@huawei.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, "nfvcon@ietf.org" <nfvcon@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
Thread-Index: Ac8uGjCORSOz84PWS6aWzeX9QW29xv//ziUAgAAXJID//sDOwA==
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:39:36 +0000
Message-ID: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F2482E436@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F2482E117@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <77748736-91BD-4207-8C25-B304FB44308B@lucidvision.com> <53061E3F.4040200@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <53061E3F.4040200@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.128]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfvcon/35r3dlmfnV6sajTq8hSKL_lcBto
Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
X-BeenThere: nfvcon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "NFV \(Network Function Virtualization\) Configuration and Modeling" <nfvcon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfvcon/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfvcon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:39:51 -0000

Hi Tom and Melinda,

Thank you for the advice. Substantial progress is most important, and for IETF, it mostly means drafts. Let's see whether we can put some substantial drafts on the table soon after the upcoming IETF meeting.

And yes, identifying a issue is indeed needed. NFV Configuration covers a wide range. But if we look at the requirements for provisioning a VNF service, or a VNF graph service , that should be narrow.

Best Regards!
-Haibin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: NFVCON [mailto:nfvcon-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Melinda Shore
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:25 PM
> To: nfvcon@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
> 
> On 2/20/14 5:01 AM, Thomas Nadeau wrote:
> > Let me suggest you consider coming to the Ops Area, NetMod and NetConf
> > to discuss configuration issues and related data models. *)
> 
> This work got time on the agenda at opsawg at IETF 88 and there's been little
> discussion since.  I do think that it's possible to make substantial progress
> without meeting in person, and that it would be worthwhile to take some time
> before the meeting to identify an issues that need resolution or that would
> benefit from face-to- face discussion.
> 
> Melinda
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NFVCON mailing list
> NFVCON@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon