IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89

Carl Moberg <calle@tail-f.com> Tue, 25 February 2014 07:25 UTC

Return-Path: <calle@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6B91A034E for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 23:25:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BORLJrKxK7Sj for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 23:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [109.74.15.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493711A0527 for <nfvcon@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 23:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.203] (228.Red-80-39-115.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.39.115.228]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9619240C22A; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:25:00 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Carl Moberg <calle@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8291A9C@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:24:59 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3A9432A7-AEFE-4B33-840A-50CAA375BF06@tail-f.com>
References: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F2482E117@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <77748736-91BD-4207-8C25-B304FB44308B@lucidvision.com> <53061E3F.4040200@gmail.com> <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F2482E436@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <0F95A18E-04EF-4382-B4E3-2815D89B7FF7@tid.es> <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8290080@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net> <FA1A9BC2-7FB3-4F72-A599-DA6DBEF3D17F@lucidvision.com> <6A4705EB-6A35-4671-BC0B-F7640A3158E5@tail-f.com> <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8291A9C@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfvcon/I9OFOt987aM01i4fZVSA9aGnj6g
Cc: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, "nfvcon@ietf.org" <nfvcon@ietf.org>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, ext Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, "Songhaibin (A)" <haibin.song@huawei.com>, "ext Diego R. Lopez" <diego@tid.es>
Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
X-BeenThere: nfvcon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "NFV \(Network Function Virtualization\) Configuration and Modeling" <nfvcon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfvcon/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfvcon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:25:06 -0000

 Not exactly sure if by “you should come to IETF again” mean the next meeting in London? Otherwise I’m always interested in swing what you’re doing, Mehmet :-)

On Feb 24, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> wrote:

> Carl,
> 
> you should come to IETF again. Then you will see what we are doing ;-).
> 
> Cheers, 
> Mehmet 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ext Carl Moberg [mailto:calle@tail-f.com]
>> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 5:29 PM
>> To: Thomas Nadeau
>> Cc: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich); Songhaibin (A); ext Diego R.
>> Lopez; nfvcon@ietf.org; Melinda Shore; ext Andy Bierman
>> Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
>> 
>> 
>> On Feb 24, 2014, at 3:15 PM, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Feb 23, 2014:10:05 AM, at 10:05 AM, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN -
>> DE/Munich) <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Dear Diego, All,
>>>> 
>>>> NETCONF is well-prepared for addressing function configuration on
>> diverse reference points of the NFV architecture.
>>>> The new interface descriptions in ETSI NFV use a producer/consumer
>> paradigm and the interface can be re-exposed practically by any entity.
>>>> RESTCONF would be perfect in such an environment as it can support
>> HTML-based REST-like configuration.
>>> 
>>> 	Take a look at opendaylight.org. We already have a working
>> implementation of a RestConf interface working on the controller as
>> part of the first release (hydrogen) that talks to a variety of routers
>> and switches (real and virtual).
>>> 
>>> 	--Tom
>> 
>> That's strange. I didn't even know we had a WG draft for RESTCONF yet?
>> 
>> --
>> Carl Moberg
>> VP Technology
>> twitter: @cmoberg
>> http://www.tail-f.com/
> 

--
Carl Moberg
VP Technology
twitter: @cmoberg
http://www.tail-f.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email