Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Mon, 24 February 2014 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39261A0161 for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:50:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjH0OoguH0gh for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:50:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF311A015D for <nfvcon@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:50:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1OFoR7k020171 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:50:27 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.32]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1OFoROD012954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:50:27 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC009.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.40) by DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:50:27 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.200]) by DEMUHTC009.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:50:26 +0100
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: ext Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Thread-Topic: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
Thread-Index: AQHPMXUvRSOz84PWS6aWzeX9QW29xprEh7EA
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:50:26 +0000
Message-ID: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F829192C@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
References: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F2482E117@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <77748736-91BD-4207-8C25-B304FB44308B@lucidvision.com> <53061E3F.4040200@gmail.com> <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F2482E436@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <0F95A18E-04EF-4382-B4E3-2815D89B7FF7@tid.es> <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8290080@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net> <FA1A9BC2-7FB3-4F72-A599-DA6DBEF3D17F@lucidvision.com> <CABCOCHQ7KR9M+Kgqqq0FEKngUax1FhKOJ3j05ferUAdPoUuO=Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHQ7KR9M+Kgqqq0FEKngUax1FhKOJ3j05ferUAdPoUuO=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.125]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F829192CDEMUMBX005nsnintr_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 19192
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1393257028-00005322-1B6F751A/0-0/0-0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfvcon/ME9G-jG0UkRrPI6OzDGsYKzvvM8
Cc: "Songhaibin \(A\)" <haibin.song@huawei.com>, "ext Diego R. Lopez" <diego@tid.es>, "nfvcon@ietf.org" <nfvcon@ietf.org>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
X-BeenThere: nfvcon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "NFV \(Network Function Virtualization\) Configuration and Modeling" <nfvcon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfvcon/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfvcon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:50:50 -0000

> OpenDaylight is the existence proof that RESTCONF/YANG will work great as a starting point for I2RS.

This is exactly what I believe.

Cheers,
Mehmet

From: ext Andy Bierman [mailto:andy@yumaworks.com]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 4:29 PM
To: Thomas Nadeau
Cc: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich); ext Diego R. Lopez; Songhaibin (A); Melinda Shore; nfvcon@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89



On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com<mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>> wrote:

On Feb 23, 2014:10:05 AM, at 10:05 AM, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com<mailto:mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>> wrote:

> Dear Diego, All,
>
> NETCONF is well-prepared for addressing function configuration on diverse reference points of the NFV architecture.
> The new interface descriptions in ETSI NFV use a producer/consumer paradigm and the interface can be re-exposed practically by any entity.
> RESTCONF would be perfect in such an environment as it can support HTML-based REST-like configuration.

        Take a look at opendaylight.org<http://opendaylight.org>. We already have a working implementation of a RestConf interface working on the controller as part of the first release (hydrogen) that talks to a variety of routers and switches (real and virtual).


+1

I've seen the YANG modules (I hear from the developers every time
yangcli-pro does something wrong with those modules ;-) Very impressive
amount of work done already.

OpenDaylight is the existence proof that RESTCONF/YANG
will work great as a starting point for I2RS.


        --Tom

Andy




> Haibin: I would be available through the week, except on Monday.
>
> Cheers,
> Mehmet
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NFVCON [mailto:nfvcon-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:nfvcon-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of ext Diego R.
>> Lopez
>> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 12:41 AM
>> To: Songhaibin (A)
>> Cc: Melinda Shore; nfvcon@ietf.org<mailto:nfvcon@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> You know I was skeptical about this initiative, but I must say I am
>> starting to see some potential areas of application of specific NFV
>> configuration aspects, at least in what relates to defining properties
>> of the VNF Forwarding Graph (what has some interesting challenges
>> regarding how you deal with dynamic graphs in the interaction of the
>> VNFs with the infrastructure) and the attachment points of a
>> virtualized service. Furthermore, if we could move in the direction of
>> prescribing a single method for dealing with function configuration
>> (NETCONF based, I'd say) it would be a great step.
>>
>> I guess one of the key things we need to decide is what are the
>> reference points to be addressed in the NFV architectural framework.
>>
>> Be goode,
>>
>> On 21 Feb 2014, at 03:39 , Songhaibin (A) <haibin.song@huawei.com<mailto:haibin.song@huawei.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tom and Melinda,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the advice. Substantial progress is most important, and
>> for IETF, it mostly means drafts. Let's see whether we can put some
>> substantial drafts on the table soon after the upcoming IETF meeting.
>>>
>>> And yes, identifying a issue is indeed needed. NFV Configuration
>> covers a wide range. But if we look at the requirements for
>> provisioning a VNF service, or a VNF graph service , that should be
>> narrow.
>>>
>>> Best Regards!
>>> -Haibin
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: NFVCON [mailto:nfvcon-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:nfvcon-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Melinda
>> Shore
>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:25 PM
>>>> To: nfvcon@ietf.org<mailto:nfvcon@ietf.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
>>>>
>>>> On 2/20/14 5:01 AM, Thomas Nadeau wrote:
>>>>> Let me suggest you consider coming to the Ops Area, NetMod and
>> NetConf
>>>>> to discuss configuration issues and related data models. *)
>>>>
>>>> This work got time on the agenda at opsawg at IETF 88 and there's
>> been little
>>>> discussion since.  I do think that it's possible to make substantial
>> progress
>>>> without meeting in person, and that it would be worthwhile to take
>> some time
>>>> before the meeting to identify an issues that need resolution or
>> that would
>>>> benefit from face-to- face discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Melinda
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NFVCON mailing list
>>>> NFVCON@ietf.org<mailto:NFVCON@ietf.org>
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NFVCON mailing list
>>> NFVCON@ietf.org<mailto:NFVCON@ietf.org>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"
>>
>> Dr Diego R. Lopez
>> Telefonica I+D
>> http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/
>>
>> e-mail: diego@tid.es<mailto:diego@tid.es>
>> Tel:    +34 913 129 041
>> Mobile: +34 682 051 091
>> -----------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede
>> consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico
>> en el enlace situado más abajo.
>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send
>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
>> _______________________________________________
>> NFVCON mailing list
>> NFVCON@ietf.org<mailto:NFVCON@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
> _______________________________________________
> NFVCON mailing list
> NFVCON@ietf.org<mailto:NFVCON@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon