IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [NFVCON] related work progress in IETF

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Mon, 20 January 2014 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A2D1A0129 for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 03:30:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jl1VWORhAosL for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 03:30:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54EF1A0122 for <nfvcon@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 03:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s0KBUTVK016897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:30:29 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC002.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.33]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s0KBUTfS009178 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:30:29 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC008.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.39) by DEMUHTC002.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:30:29 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.200]) by DEMUHTC008.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:30:29 +0100
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: ext Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, "nfvcon@ietf.org" <nfvcon@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [NFVCON] related work progress in IETF
Thread-Index: AQHPFdGaPI0Frayl3kSVr/MclwTsAZqNeGgg
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:30:28 +0000
Message-ID: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F82608EE@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
References: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F24827A37@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <52DD0664.4020404@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52DD0664.4020404@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.122]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1009
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1390217430-00001A6F-3B554D5A/0-0/0-0
Subject: Re: [NFVCON] related work progress in IETF
X-BeenThere: nfvcon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "NFV \(Network Function Virtualization\) Configuration and Modeling" <nfvcon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfvcon/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfvcon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:30:36 -0000

Hi Melinda,

the discussion on IETF gap analysis has just started in the ETSI NFV MANO WG.
A document which can be made available outside of ETSI will take some time.
Though we are planning to communicate the ongoing discussion in a side meeting or BarBof at IETF #89.

Cheers, 
Mehmet 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: NFVCON [mailto:nfvcon-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Melinda
> Shore
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 12:20 PM
> To: nfvcon@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [NFVCON] related work progress in IETF
> 
> On 1/19/14 11:34 PM, Songhaibin (A) wrote:
> > I think we can have another bar BoF at next IETF meeting to discuss
> > these things. And we noticed that ETSI had some gap analysis work
> > done. We can also discuss it.
> 
> Is this document available to those who are not ETSI members?
> 
> Melinda
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NFVCON mailing list
> NFVCON@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email