IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [NFVCON] NFVCon BoF request

Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Wed, 11 June 2014 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAED1A00D2 for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oG83iEk4rNsh for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1071A00C9 for <nfvcon@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.181.109.54] (mobile-166-137-176-061.mycingular.net [166.137.176.61]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4892327DD431; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:59:13 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D201)
In-Reply-To: <FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F4F47C1E2@EXMBX23.ad.utwente.nl>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:59:12 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AEECF136-9F27-414A-848C-D58239000415@lucidvision.com>
References: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F650ED2E5@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F4F47C1E2@EXMBX23.ad.utwente.nl>
To: "<karagian@cs.utwente.nl>" <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfvcon/RN-8cI4GnRjgHBHMBhPkCvYltqI
Cc: "<haibin.song@huawei.com>" <haibin.song@huawei.com>, "<nfvcon@ietf.org>" <nfvcon@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [NFVCON] NFVCon BoF request
X-BeenThere: nfvcon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "NFV \(Network Function Virtualization\) Configuration and Modeling" <nfvcon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfvcon/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfvcon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:59:16 -0000

Is there an update to the problem statement draft? It's expired.

Tom 


> On Jun 11, 2014, at 12:33 AM, <karagian@cs.utwente.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi Haibin,
> 
> Good action!
> I think that it is good to have this discussion in Toronto!
> 
> Best regards,
> Georgios
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NFVCON [mailto:nfvcon-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Songhaibin
>> (A)
>> Sent: woensdag 11 juni 2014 3:08
>> To: nfvcon@ietf.org
>> Subject: [NFVCON] NFVCon BoF request
>> 
>> Dear folks,
>> 
>> We sent a non-wg-forming BoF request to OPS AD for meeting at Toronto.
>> The goal of the BoF is NOT to form a working group, but mainly with
>> discussing the NFV use cases, to identify the potential protocol extensions or
>> interactions with existing WGs (such like Netconf , SFC).
>> 
>> Now the information is on the bof wiki page.
>> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/bof
>> 
>> Best Regards!
>> -Haibin
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NFVCON mailing list
>> NFVCON@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NFVCON mailing list
> NFVCON@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email