Re: [NFVCON] NFVCon BoF request

Dear Thomas,

It will be updated by this week or early next week. 

And by the way, the BoF request was denied.

Best Regards!
-Haibin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Nadeau [mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 9:59 PM
> To: <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
> Cc: Songhaibin (A); <nfvcon@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [NFVCON] NFVCon BoF request
> 
> Is there an update to the problem statement draft? It's expired.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> > On Jun 11, 2014, at 12:33 AM, <karagian@cs.utwente.nl> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Haibin,
> >
> > Good action!
> > I think that it is good to have this discussion in Toronto!
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Georgios
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: NFVCON [mailto:nfvcon-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Songhaibin
> >> (A)
> >> Sent: woensdag 11 juni 2014 3:08
> >> To: nfvcon@ietf.org
> >> Subject: [NFVCON] NFVCon BoF request
> >>
> >> Dear folks,
> >>
> >> We sent a non-wg-forming BoF request to OPS AD for meeting at Toronto.
> >> The goal of the BoF is NOT to form a working group, but mainly with
> >> discussing the NFV use cases, to identify the potential protocol
> >> extensions or interactions with existing WGs (such like Netconf , SFC).
> >>
> >> Now the information is on the bof wiki page.
> >>
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/bof
> >>
> >> Best Regards!
> >> -Haibin
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NFVCON mailing list
> >> NFVCON@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NFVCON mailing list
> > NFVCON@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
> >