Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Sun, 23 February 2014 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2C51A0641 for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 07:05:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_60=1.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T25S8HLKcNet for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 07:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8373E1A0101 for <nfvcon@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 07:05:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1NF5JZc003364 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:05:20 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.32]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1NF5J0c000695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:05:19 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC006.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.37) by DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:05:18 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.200]) by DEMUHTC006.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:05:18 +0100
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: "ext Diego R. Lopez" <diego@tid.es>, "Songhaibin (A)" <haibin.song@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
Thread-Index: Ac8uGjCORSOz84PWS6aWzeX9QW29xv//ziUAgAAXJID//sDOwIAFY9WA//7v6OA=
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:05:17 +0000
Message-ID: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8290080@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
References: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F2482E117@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <77748736-91BD-4207-8C25-B304FB44308B@lucidvision.com> <53061E3F.4040200@gmail.com> <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F2482E436@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <0F95A18E-04EF-4382-B4E3-2815D89B7FF7@tid.es>
In-Reply-To: <0F95A18E-04EF-4382-B4E3-2815D89B7FF7@tid.es>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.109]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 5646
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1393167920-00005322-D12F760E/0-0/0-0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfvcon/_ASabvreEwxsH8o2KpjzCuJkdbE
Cc: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, "nfvcon@ietf.org" <nfvcon@ietf.org>, ext Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
X-BeenThere: nfvcon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "NFV \(Network Function Virtualization\) Configuration and Modeling" <nfvcon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfvcon/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfvcon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:05:30 -0000

Dear Diego, All,

NETCONF is well-prepared for addressing function configuration on diverse reference points of the NFV architecture.
The new interface descriptions in ETSI NFV use a producer/consumer paradigm and the interface can be re-exposed practically by any entity.
RESTCONF would be perfect in such an environment as it can support HTML-based REST-like configuration.

Haibin: I would be available through the week, except on Monday.

Cheers, 
Mehmet 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NFVCON [mailto:nfvcon-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Diego R.
> Lopez
> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 12:41 AM
> To: Songhaibin (A)
> Cc: Melinda Shore; nfvcon@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
> 
> Hi,
> 
> You know I was skeptical about this initiative, but I must say I am
> starting to see some potential areas of application of specific NFV
> configuration aspects, at least in what relates to defining properties
> of the VNF Forwarding Graph (what has some interesting challenges
> regarding how you deal with dynamic graphs in the interaction of the
> VNFs with the infrastructure) and the attachment points of a
> virtualized service. Furthermore, if we could move in the direction of
> prescribing a single method for dealing with function configuration
> (NETCONF based, I'd say) it would be a great step.
> 
> I guess one of the key things we need to decide is what are the
> reference points to be addressed in the NFV architectural framework.
> 
> Be goode,
> 
> On 21 Feb 2014, at 03:39 , Songhaibin (A) <haibin.song@huawei.com>;
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tom and Melinda,
> >
> > Thank you for the advice. Substantial progress is most important, and
> for IETF, it mostly means drafts. Let's see whether we can put some
> substantial drafts on the table soon after the upcoming IETF meeting.
> >
> > And yes, identifying a issue is indeed needed. NFV Configuration
> covers a wide range. But if we look at the requirements for
> provisioning a VNF service, or a VNF graph service , that should be
> narrow.
> >
> > Best Regards!
> > -Haibin
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: NFVCON [mailto:nfvcon-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Melinda
> Shore
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:25 PM
> >> To: nfvcon@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
> >>
> >> On 2/20/14 5:01 AM, Thomas Nadeau wrote:
> >>> Let me suggest you consider coming to the Ops Area, NetMod and
> NetConf
> >>> to discuss configuration issues and related data models. *)
> >>
> >> This work got time on the agenda at opsawg at IETF 88 and there's
> been little
> >> discussion since.  I do think that it's possible to make substantial
> progress
> >> without meeting in person, and that it would be worthwhile to take
> some time
> >> before the meeting to identify an issues that need resolution or
> that would
> >> benefit from face-to- face discussion.
> >>
> >> Melinda
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NFVCON mailing list
> >> NFVCON@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NFVCON mailing list
> > NFVCON@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
> 
> 
> --
> "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"
> 
> Dr Diego R. Lopez
> Telefonica I+D
> http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/
> 
> e-mail: diego@tid.es
> Tel:    +34 913 129 041
> Mobile: +34 682 051 091
> -----------------------------------------
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede
> consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico
> en el enlace situado más abajo.
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send
> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
> _______________________________________________
> NFVCON mailing list
> NFVCON@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon